School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, England.
BMC Oral Health. 2012 Aug 21;12:33. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-12-33.
To assess the ability of fluorescence imaging to detect a dose response relationship between fluorosis severity and different levels of fluoride in water supplies compared to remote photographic scoring in selected populations participating in an observational, epidemiological survey in Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Subjects were male and female lifetime residents aged 8-13 years. For each child the fluoride content of cooking water samples (CWS) was assessed to create categorical intervals of water fluoride concentration. Fluorescence images were taken of the maxillary central incisors and analyzed for dental fluorosis using two different software techniques. Output metrics for the fluorescence imaging techniques were compared to TF scores from blinded photographic scores obtained from the survey.
Data from 553 subjects were available. Both software analysis techniques demonstrated significant correlations with the photographic scores. The metrics for area effected by fluorosis and the overall fluorescence loss had the strongest association with the photographic TF score (Spearman's rho 0.664 and 0.652 respectively). Both software techniques performed well for comparison of repeat fluorescence images with ICC values of 0.95 and 0.85 respectively.
This study supports the potential use of fluorescence imaging for the objective quantification of dental fluorosis. Fluorescence imaging was able to discriminate between populations with different fluoride exposures on a comparable level to remote photographic scoring with acceptable levels of repeatability.
为了评估荧光成像在检测氟中毒严重程度与饮用水中不同氟水平之间剂量反应关系方面的能力,与泰国清迈参与观察性、流行病学调查的选定人群的远程摄影评分进行了比较。
研究对象为年龄在 8-13 岁之间的男性和女性终身居民。对每个孩子的烹饪水样本(CWS)中的氟含量进行评估,以创建水氟浓度的分类间隔。对上颌中切牙进行荧光成像,并使用两种不同的软件技术分析氟斑牙。荧光成像技术的输出指标与从调查中获得的盲法摄影评分的 TF 评分进行比较。
553 名受试者的数据可用。两种软件分析技术均与摄影评分显示出显著相关性。受氟斑牙影响的区域指标和整体荧光损失指标与摄影 TF 评分的相关性最强(Spearman 的 rho 值分别为 0.664 和 0.652)。两种软件技术在比较重复荧光图像时表现良好,ICC 值分别为 0.95 和 0.85。
本研究支持荧光成像在客观定量氟斑牙方面的潜在应用。荧光成像能够在可接受的重复性水平上,在不同氟暴露人群之间进行区分,与远程摄影评分具有可比性。