Virginia Clinical Research Inc, Norfolk, Virginia 23507, USA.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Feb;68(2):255-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.07.014. Epub 2012 Aug 19.
Current treatments for chronic lichen planus (LP) are often ineffective and may have significant adverse side effects. An alternative safe and effective treatment for recalcitrant LP is needed.
We sought to study the safety and efficacy of apremilast in the treatment of moderate to severe LP.
Ten patients with biopsy-proven LP received 20 mg of apremilast orally twice daily for 12 weeks with 4 weeks of treatment-free follow-up. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients achieving a 2-grade or more improvement in the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) after 12 weeks of treatment.
Three (30%) of the 10 patients achieved a 2-grade or more improvement in the PGA after 12 weeks of treatment; however, all patients demonstrated statistically significant clinical improvement with respect to secondary parameters between baseline and the end of treatment.
It may be difficult to generalize the results of this study to a larger patient population with LP because of our small sample size and lack of a control group. In addition, a longer treatment period or higher dose may have been needed for therapeutic efficacy. The safety and efficacy of long-term apremilast therapy is currently unknown.
Apremilast may be efficacious in the treatment of LP, but double-blinded, controlled trials are necessary to thoroughly evaluate its safety and efficacy.
目前治疗慢性扁平苔藓(LP)的方法往往效果不佳,且可能有显著的不良反应。因此,我们需要一种安全有效的替代方法来治疗顽固的 LP。
我们旨在研究阿普米司特治疗中重度 LP 的安全性和有效性。
10 例经活检证实的 LP 患者接受 20mg 阿普米司特,每日口服 2 次,疗程 12 周,停药 4 周后进行随访。主要疗效终点为治疗 12 周后,PGA 改善≥2 级的患者比例。
10 例患者中有 3 例(30%)在治疗 12 周后 PGA 改善≥2 级;然而,所有患者在次要参数方面均显示出与基线相比在治疗结束时具有统计学意义的临床改善。
由于样本量小且缺乏对照组,因此很难将本研究的结果推广到更大的 LP 患者群体。此外,可能需要更长的治疗时间或更高的剂量才能达到治疗效果。阿普米司特长期治疗的安全性和有效性目前尚不清楚。
阿普米司特可能对 LP 治疗有效,但仍需要双盲对照试验来全面评估其安全性和有效性。