The Centre for Accident Research and Road Safety-Queensland, Queensland University of Technology, 130 Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia.
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Jan;50:975-83. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.07.024. Epub 2012 Aug 19.
This paper examines the effects of an eco-driving message on driver distraction. Two in-vehicle distracter tasks were compared with an eco-driving task and a baseline task in an advanced driving simulator. N=22 subjects were asked to perform an eco-driving, CD changing, and a navigation task while engaged in critical manoeuvres during which they were expected to respond to a peripheral detection task (PDT) with total duration of 3.5h. The study involved two sessions over two consecutive days. The results show that drivers' mental workloads are significantly higher during navigation and CD changing tasks in comparison to the two other scenarios. However, eco-driving mental workload is still marginally significant (p∼.05) across different manoeuvres. Similarly, event detection tasks show that drivers miss significantly more events in the navigation and CD changing scenarios in comparison to both the baseline and eco-driving scenario. Analysis of the practice effect shows that drivers' baseline scenario and navigation scenario exhibit significantly less demand on the second day. Drivers also can detect significantly more events on the second day for all scenarios. The authors conclude that even reading a simple message while driving could potentially lead to missing an important event, especially when executing critical manoeuvres. However, there is some evidence of a practice effect which suggests that future research should focus on performance with habitual rather than novel tasks. It is recommended that sending text as an eco-driving message analogous to the study circumstances should not be delivered to drivers on-line when vehicle is in motion.
本文探讨了生态驾驶信息对驾驶员注意力分散的影响。在高级驾驶模拟器中,将两种车内干扰任务与生态驾驶任务和基线任务进行了比较。要求 22 名受试者在进行关键操作时执行生态驾驶、换 CD 和导航任务,同时进行外周检测任务(PDT),总时长为 3.5 小时。该研究涉及连续两天的两个会话。结果表明,与其他两种情况相比,驾驶员在导航和换 CD 任务中的心理工作量明显更高。然而,生态驾驶的心理工作量在不同的操作中仍然略有显著(p∼.05)。同样,事件检测任务表明,与基线和生态驾驶场景相比,驾驶员在导航和换 CD 场景中错过的事件明显更多。对练习效果的分析表明,驾驶员在第二天的基线场景和导航场景的需求明显减少。驾驶员还可以在第二天为所有场景检测到更多的事件。作者得出结论,即使在驾驶时阅读简单的信息也可能导致错过重要事件,尤其是在执行关键操作时。然而,有一些证据表明存在练习效应,这表明未来的研究应该集中在习惯性而不是新颖任务上的表现。建议在车辆行驶时,不要在线向驾驶员发送类似于研究情况的文本作为生态驾驶信息。