Suppr超能文献

预测 I 期临床试验入组患者的早期死亡:基于血小板计数和白蛋白的新模型的建立和验证。

Prediction of early death among patients enrolled in phase I trials: development and validation of a new model based on platelet count and albumin.

机构信息

Centre Oscar Lambret, Medical Oncology Department, 3 rue Combemale, Lille 59020, France.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2012 Sep 25;107(7):1025-30. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.371. Epub 2012 Aug 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Selecting patients with 'sufficient life expectancy' for Phase I oncology trials remains challenging. The Royal Marsden Hospital Score (RMS) previously identified high-risk patients as those with ≥ 2 of the following: albumin <35 g l(-1); LDH > upper limit of normal; >2 metastatic sites. This study developed an alternative prognostic model, and compared its performance with that of the RMS.

METHODS

The primary end point was the 90-day mortality rate. The new model was developed from the same database as RMS, but it used Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection (CHAID). The ROC characteristics of both methods were then validated in an independent database of 324 patients enrolled in European Organization on Research and Treatment of Cancer Phase I trials of cytotoxic agents between 2000 and 2009.

RESULTS

The CHAID method identified high-risk patients as those with albumin <33 g l(-1) or ≥ 33 g l(-1), but platelet counts ≥ 400.000 mm(-3). In the validation data set, the rates of correctly classified patients were 0.79 vs 0.67 for the CHAID model and RMS, respectively. The negative predictive values (NPV) were similar for the CHAID model and RMS.

CONCLUSION

The CHAID model and RMS provided a similarly high level of NPV, but the CHAID model gave a better accuracy in the validation set. Both CHAID model and RMS may improve the screening process in phase I trials.

摘要

背景

为肿瘤 I 期临床试验选择“预期寿命足够”的患者仍然具有挑战性。皇家马斯登医院评分(RMS)此前将高危患者定义为符合以下≥ 2 项标准的患者:白蛋白<35 g/L;LDH >正常值上限;>2 个转移部位。本研究开发了一种替代预后模型,并比较了其与 RMS 的性能。

方法

主要终点为 90 天死亡率。新模型与 RMS 来自同一数据库,但使用了卡方自动交互检测(CHAID)。然后在 2000 年至 2009 年期间,欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)I 期细胞毒性药物临床试验中纳入的 324 例患者的独立数据库中验证了这两种方法的 ROC 特征。

结果

CHAID 方法将高危患者定义为白蛋白<33 g/L 或≥33 g/L,但血小板计数≥400.000 mm(-3)。在验证数据集,正确分类患者的比例分别为 CHAID 模型和 RMS 为 0.79 和 0.67。CHAID 模型和 RMS 的阴性预测值(NPV)相似。

结论

CHAID 模型和 RMS 提供了相似的高 NPV,但 CHAID 模型在验证集中的准确性更高。CHAID 模型和 RMS 均可改善 I 期试验的筛选过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d583/3461164/52547b25b482/bjc2012371f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验