Dept of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2012 Sep;138(3):367-73. doi: 10.1309/AJCP3YXID2UHZPHT.
Few reports have documented the effectiveness of Lean quality improvement in changing anatomic pathology patient safety. We used Lean methods of education; hoshin kanri goal setting and culture change; kaizen events; observation of work activities, hand-offs, and pathways; A3-problem solving, metric development, and measurement; and frontline work redesign in the accessioning and gross examination areas of an anatomic pathology laboratory. We compared the pre- and post-Lean implementation proportion of near-miss events and changes made in specific work processes. In the implementation phase, we documented 29 individual A3-root cause analyses. The pre- and postimplementation proportions of process- and operator-dependent near-miss events were 5.5 and 1.8 (P < .002) and 0.6 and 0.6, respectively. We conclude that through culture change and implementation of specific work process changes, Lean implementation may improve pathology patient safety.
鲜有报告记录精益质量改进在改变解剖病理学患者安全方面的效果。我们在解剖病理学实验室的登记和大体检查区域使用了精益方法,包括教育、政策目标设定和文化变革、改善活动、观察工作活动、交接和路径、A3 问题解决、指标制定和测量、以及一线工作设计。我们比较了精益实施前后接近差错事件的比例以及特定工作流程的变化。在实施阶段,我们记录了 29 个单独的 A3 根本原因分析。与流程和操作人员相关的接近差错事件的实施前后比例分别为 5.5 和 1.8(P <.002)和 0.6 和 0.6。我们得出结论,通过文化变革和实施具体的工作流程变革,精益实施可能会提高病理学患者安全性。