Suppr超能文献

为什么是比昂?为什么是荣格?就此而言,为什么是弗洛伊德?

Why Bion? Why Jung? For that matter, why Freud?

作者信息

Rosegrant John

机构信息

Arizona Center for Psychoanalytic Studies, AZ, USA.

出版信息

J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2012 Aug;60(4):721-45. doi: 10.1177/0003065112453485.

Abstract

Bion and Jung share both a significant disjunction from reflecting on personal experience, and a commitment to connecting with a higher truth outside of personal experience; in this they contrast with the Freudian standpoint that fully engages with reflecting on personal experience, and that considers efforts to connect to a higher truth as themselves usefully thought about in terms of their personal meaning. In these aspects of their work, Bion and Jung strongly endorse a romantic and communal approach to experience, whereas Freud essentially integrates the romantic and communal with the classical and agentic.

摘要

比昂和荣格在反思个人经历方面都存在显著分歧,并且都致力于与个人经历之外的更高真理建立联系;在这一点上,他们与弗洛伊德的观点形成对比,弗洛伊德的观点完全专注于反思个人经历,并且认为试图与更高真理建立联系的努力本身就可以从其个人意义的角度进行有益的思考。在他们工作的这些方面,比昂和荣格强烈支持一种浪漫和集体主义的体验方式,而弗洛伊德则基本上将浪漫和集体主义与古典和能动主义结合起来。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验