Falzeder Ernst
J Anal Psychol. 2007 Jun;52(3):343-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2007.00666.x.
This paper examines the short-lived flirtation between psychoanalysis and academia and psychiatry in Europe and the reasons for, and consequences of, the fact that their paths diverged. It is argued that Bleuler's break with the psychoanalytic movement is a crucial and, until now, largely underestimated turning point. Bleuler's separation from the psychoanalytic movement was probably more important for the course it has since taken than those of Adler, Stekel, or even Jung. Bleuler's analysis by correspondence by Freud, and its failure, was of paramount importance for the future relationship between Freud and Bleuler, and for Bleuler's assessment of psychoanalysis.
本文考察了精神分析与欧洲学术界及精神病学之间短暂的接触,以及它们分道扬镳的原因和后果。有人认为,布洛伊勒与精神分析运动的决裂是一个关键的、迄今为止在很大程度上被低估的转折点。布洛伊勒与精神分析运动的分离对其后续发展历程的影响,可能比阿德勒、施泰克尔乃至荣格的分离更为重要。弗洛伊德通过书信对布洛伊勒进行的分析及其失败,对弗洛伊德与布洛伊勒未来的关系以及布洛伊勒对精神分析的评估至关重要。