Wang Hongwei, Li Changqing, Liu Tao, Zhao Wei-Dong, Zhou Yue
Department of Orthopedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Xinqiao Street, Chongqing, China.
Indian J Orthop. 2012 Jul;46(4):395-401. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.98827.
Use of a pedicle screw at the level of fracture, also known as an intermediate screw, has been shown to improve clinical results in managing lumbar fracture, but there is a paucity of biomechanical studies to support the claim. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding intermediate pedicle screws at the level of a fracture on the stiffness of a short-segment pedicle fixation using monoaxial or polyaxial screws and to compare the strength of monoaxial and polyaxial screws in the calf spine fracture model.
Flexibility of 12 fresh-frozen calf lumbar spine specimens was evaluated in all planes. An unstable burst fracture model was created at the level of L3 by the pre-injury and dropped-mass technique. The specimens were randomly divided into monoaxial pedicle screw (MPS) and polyaxial pedicle screw (PPS) groups. Flexibility was retested without and with intermediate screws (MPSi and PPSi) placed at the level of fracture in addition to standard screws placed at L2 and L4.
The addition of intermediate screws significantly increased the stability of the constructs, as measured by a decreased range of motion (ROM) in flexion, extension, and lateral bending in both MPS and PPS groups (P < 0.05). There was neither any significant difference in the ROM in the spines of the two groups before injury, nor a difference in the ROM between the MPSi and PPSi groups (P > 0.05), but there was a significant difference between MPS and PPS in flexion and extension in the short-segment fixation group (P < 0.05).
The addition of intermediate screws at the level of a burst fracture significantly increased the stability of short-segment pedicle screw fixation in both the MPS and PPS groups. However, in short-segment fixation group, monoaxial pedicle screw exhibited more stability in flexion and extension than the polyaxial pedicle screw.
在骨折节段使用椎弓根螺钉,即中间螺钉,已被证明可改善腰椎骨折的临床治疗效果,但缺乏生物力学研究来支持这一说法。本研究的目的是评估在骨折节段添加中间椎弓根螺钉对使用单轴或多轴螺钉的短节段椎弓根固定刚度的影响,并比较单轴和多轴螺钉在小牛脊柱骨折模型中的强度。
评估12个新鲜冷冻小牛腰椎标本在所有平面的柔韧性。采用预损伤和坠落重物技术在L3水平创建不稳定爆裂骨折模型。将标本随机分为单轴椎弓根螺钉(MPS)组和多轴椎弓根螺钉(PPS)组。除了在L2和L4放置标准螺钉外,在骨折节段放置或不放置中间螺钉(MPSi和PPSi)后重新测试柔韧性。
添加中间螺钉显著增加了固定结构的稳定性,通过MPS和PPS组在屈曲、伸展和侧方弯曲时活动范围(ROM)的减小来衡量(P < 0.05)。两组脊柱损伤前的ROM没有显著差异,MPSi和PPSi组之间的ROM也没有差异(P > 0.05),但在短节段固定组中,MPS和PPS在屈曲和伸展方面存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。
在爆裂骨折节段添加中间螺钉显著增加了MPS和PPS组短节段椎弓根螺钉固定的稳定性。然而,在短节段固定组中,单轴椎弓根螺钉在屈曲和伸展方面比多轴椎弓根螺钉表现出更高的稳定性。