颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术与人工关节置换术治疗单节段颈椎病的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty versus arthrodesis for single-level cervical spondylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043407. Epub 2012 Aug 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty (ACDA) compared to anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) for patient-important outcomes for single-level cervical spondylosis.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Register for Randomized Controlled Trials, BIOSIS and LILACS), archives of spine meetings and bibliographies of relevant articles.

STUDY SELECTION

We included RCTs of ACDF versus ACDA in adult patients with single-level cervical spondylosis reporting at least one of the following outcomes: functionality, neurological success, neck pain, arm pain, quality of life, surgery for adjacent level degeneration (ALD), reoperation and dysphonia/dysphagia. We used no language restrictions. We performed title and abstract screening and full text screening independently and in duplicate.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We used random-effects model to pool data using mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes and relative risk (RR) for dichotomous outcomes. We used GRADE to evaluate the quality of evidence for each outcome.

RESULTS

Of 2804 citations, 9 articles reporting on 9 trials (1778 participants) were eligible. ACDA is associated with a clinically significant lower incidence of neurologic failure (RR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.37-0.75, p = 0.0004) and improvement in the Neck pain visual analogue scale (VAS) (MD = 6.56, 95% CI = 3.22-9.90, p = 0.0001; Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) = 2.5. ACDA is associated with a statistically but not clinically significant improvement in Arm pain VAS and SF-36 physical component summary. ACDA is associated with non-statistically significant higher improvement in the Neck Disability Index Score and lower incidence of ALD requiring surgery, reoperation, and dysphagia/dysphonia.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no strong evidence to support the routine use of ACDA over ACDF in single-level cervical spondylosis. Current trials lack long-term data required to assess safety as well as surgery for ALD. We suggest that ACDA in patients with single level cervical spondylosis is an option although its benefits and indication over ACDF remain in question.

摘要

目的

评估颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDA)治疗单节段颈椎病患者重要结局的疗效。

数据来源

电子数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 随机对照试验登记处、BIOSIS 和 LILACS)、脊柱会议档案和相关文章的参考文献。

研究选择

我们纳入了比较 ACDF 与 ACDA 治疗单节段颈椎病的 RCT 研究,纳入对象为至少报告以下结果之一的成年患者:功能、神经成功、颈部疼痛、手臂疼痛、生活质量、相邻节段退变(ALD)手术、再次手术和发音困难/吞咽困难。我们未设置语言限制。我们独立地、重复地进行标题和摘要筛选以及全文筛选。

数据综合

我们使用随机效应模型,采用均数差值(MD)对连续结果和相对风险(RR)对二分类结果进行汇总。我们使用 GRADE 评估每个结局的证据质量。

结果

在 2804 条引文中,有 9 篇文章报道了 9 项试验(1778 名参与者)符合纳入标准。ACDA 与神经功能失败的发生率显著降低相关(RR=0.53,95%CI=0.37-0.75,p=0.0004),颈痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)显著改善(MD=6.56,95%CI=3.22-9.90,p=0.0001;最小临床重要差异(MCID)=2.5。ACDA 与手臂痛 VAS 和 SF-36 生理成分综合评分的统计学但无临床意义的改善相关。ACDA 与非统计学意义上的颈痛残疾指数评分更高改善和较低的 ALD 手术需要、再次手术和发音困难/吞咽困难发生率相关。

结论

没有强有力的证据支持在单节段颈椎病中常规使用 ACDA 替代 ACDF。目前的试验缺乏评估安全性以及治疗 ALD 的长期数据。我们建议,对于单节段颈椎病患者,使用 ACDA 是一种选择,尽管其益处和适应证仍存在疑问。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a985/3422251/c4db9072749f/pone.0043407.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索