Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Samanpazan, Turkey.
Percept Mot Skills. 2012 Jun;114(3):837-46. doi: 10.2466/15.10.11.24.PMS.114.3.837-846.
The effect of writing and reading training on preferred font type and size in low-vision students was evaluated in 35 children. An ophthalmologist confirmed low vision according to ICD-10-CM. Children identified the font type and size they could best read. The writing subtest of the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test, read in 1 min., and legibility as measured by the number of readable written letters were used in evaluating the children. A writing and reading treatment program was conducted, beginning with the child's preferred font type and size, for 3 months, 2 days per week, for 45 min. per day at the child's school. Before treatment, the most preferred font type was Verdana; after treatment, the preferred font type and size changed. Students had gained reading and writing speed after training, but their writing legibility was not significantly better. Training might affect the preferred font type and size of students with low vision. Surprisingly, serif and sans-serif fonts were preferred about equally after treatment.
对 35 名低视力学生进行了读写训练对其首选字体和字号的影响评估。眼科医生根据 ICD-10-CM 确认了低视力。孩子们确定了他们最能阅读的字体类型和大小。使用 Jebsen-Taylor 手功能测试的书写子测试、1 分钟内阅读的内容以及可读写字母的数量来评估孩子们的阅读能力。在孩子的学校,每周进行 2 天,每天进行 45 分钟的读写治疗计划,从孩子的首选字体类型和大小开始,持续 3 个月。治疗前,最受欢迎的字体类型是 Verdana;治疗后,首选字体类型和大小发生了变化。学生在训练后提高了读写速度,但他们的书写清晰度并没有明显提高。培训可能会影响低视力学生的首选字体类型和大小。令人惊讶的是,治疗后无衬线和衬线字体同样受欢迎。