• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护病房实验室确诊血流感染的病因:八年研究

Laboratory confirmed bloodstream infection aetiology in an intensive care unit: eight years study.

作者信息

Orsi G B, Franchi C, Marrone R, Giordano A, Rocco M, Venditti M

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Ig. 2012 Jul-Aug;24(4):269-78.

PMID:22913170
Abstract

To evaluate laboratory confirmed bloodstream infection (LC-BSI) aetiology we carried out a prospective study in the general 13 bed ICU of the teaching hospital Policlinico Umberto I in Rome. According to CDC case definitions for LC-BSI, all patients admitted >48h between 2000-2007 to ICU were included. Risk factors (i.e. age, sex, SAPS II), invasive procedures (i.e. endotracheal intubation, vascular and urinary catheterisation), microbiological isolates and their antibiotic susceptibility were screened. Overall 1741 patients (64.8% males, 35.2% females) were included, mean age was 58.1 +/- 19.8, SAPS II score 45.1 +/- 17 and ICU stay 14.0 +/- 21.1 days. Finally, 167 (9.6%) patients developed 203 (11.7%) ICU-acquired LC-BSI and sources of infection were CVC (39.8%), unknown (39.3%), respiratory tract (12.4%), surgical wound (6.5%) and urinary tract (2.0%). Between 2000 and 2007 the incidence of LC-BSI/1000 patient days (14.8 per thousands vs. 7.8 per thousands: p<0.05) and LC-BSI/1000 CVC days (20.7 per thousands vs. 11.4 per thousands; p<0.05) decreased. The onset of infection followed ICU admission by 19.5 +/- 17.7 (mean) and 13 days (median). Crude mortality was 34.8%, and mortality associated with LC-BSI showed a RR 1.61; 95%CI 1.37 - 1.89; p<0.01. The most common pathogens were coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS) (26.2%), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (14.9%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (13.5%), enterococci (9.3%) and Acinetobacter bawnumannii (7.5%). Onset time (days) between ICU admission and LC-BSI was higher (p<0.01) among Gram-negative (22.9 +/- 18.4) compared to Gram-positive (16.6 +/- 15.9), fungi (23.8 +/- 25.3). High early death (<7 days after BSI diagnosis) was associated to A. baumannii (37.5%), Candida spp. (30.0%) and S. aureus (29.7%). Staphylococci presented a very high methicillin resistance (>85%). P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii showed respectively 25% and 68.7% multidrug-resistance. Over 1/3 of Eneterobacteriaceae isolates were extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL), but non resulted resistant to carbapenems. Surveillance showed a high incidence of LC-BSI associated to invasive procedures and the presence of multiresistant bacteria.

摘要

为评估实验室确诊的血流感染(LC-BSI)病因,我们在罗马的翁贝托一世综合医院拥有13张床位的普通重症监护病房(ICU)开展了一项前瞻性研究。根据美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)关于LC-BSI的病例定义,纳入了2000年至2007年间入住ICU超过48小时的所有患者。筛查了危险因素(即年龄、性别、简化急性生理学评分II [SAPS II])、侵入性操作(即气管插管、血管和导尿管插入术)、微生物分离株及其抗生素敏感性。共纳入1741例患者(男性占64.8%,女性占35.2%),平均年龄为58.1±19.8岁,SAPS II评分为45.1±17,ICU住院时间为14.0±21.1天。最终,167例(9.6%)患者发生了203例(11.7%)ICU获得性LC-BSI,感染源为中心静脉导管(CVC)(39.8%)、不明(39.3%)、呼吸道(12.4%)、手术伤口(6.5%)和泌尿道(2.0%)。2000年至2007年间,每1000患者日的LC-BSI发病率(14.8‰对7.8‰:p<0.05)和每1000 CVC日的LC-BSI发病率(20.7‰对11.4‰;p<0.05)有所下降。感染发生在入住ICU后19.5±17.7天(均值)和13天(中位数)。粗死亡率为34.8%,与LC-BSI相关的死亡率显示相对危险度(RR)为1.61;95%置信区间(CI)为1.37 - 1.89;p<0.01。最常见的病原体为凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CNS)(26.2%)、耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)(14.9%)、铜绿假单胞菌(13.5%)、肠球菌(9.3%)和鲍曼不动杆菌(7.5%)。与革兰氏阳性菌(16.6±15.9天)和真菌(23.8±25.3天)相比,革兰氏阴性菌(22.9±18.4天)在入住ICU至LC-BSI的发病时间(天数)更高(p<0.01)。早期高死亡率(BSI诊断后<7天)与鲍曼不动杆菌(37.5%)、念珠菌属(30.0%)和金黄色葡萄球菌(29.7%)相关。葡萄球菌呈现出非常高的耐甲氧西林率(>85%)。铜绿假单胞菌和鲍曼不动杆菌分别显示25%和68.7%的多重耐药率。超过1/3的肠杆菌科分离株为超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL),但对碳青霉烯类均无耐药。监测显示与侵入性操作和多重耐药菌的存在相关的LC-BSI发病率较高。

相似文献

1
Laboratory confirmed bloodstream infection aetiology in an intensive care unit: eight years study.重症监护病房实验室确诊血流感染的病因:八年研究
Ann Ig. 2012 Jul-Aug;24(4):269-78.
2
[Hospital infection prevention in an intensive care unit].[重症监护病房的医院感染预防]
Ann Ig. 2004 Jan-Apr;16(1-2):187-97.
3
Nosocomial bloodstream infections in ICU and non-ICU patients.重症监护病房(ICU)和非ICU患者的医院血流感染
Am J Infect Control. 2005 Aug;33(6):333-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2005.03.010.
4
Intensive-care-unit-acquired bloodstream infections in a regional critically ill population.某地区危重症人群中重症监护病房获得性血流感染
J Hosp Infect. 2004 Oct;58(2):137-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2004.06.007.
5
Study of nosocomial primary bloodstream infections in a pediatric intensive care unit.儿科重症监护病房医院原发性血流感染的研究
J Trop Pediatr. 2007 Apr;53(2):87-92. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fml073. Epub 2006 Dec 6.
6
[Hospital infection surveillance in 5 Roman intensive care units].[罗马5家重症监护病房的医院感染监测]
Ann Ig. 2003 Jan-Feb;15(1):23-34.
7
Infections in a surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital in Greece.希腊一家大学医院外科重症监护病房的感染情况。
Int J Infect Dis. 2009 Mar;13(2):145-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2008.05.1227. Epub 2008 Sep 5.
8
Bloodstream infections in pediatric patients.儿科患者的血流感染
Saudi Med J. 2005 Oct;26(10):1555-61.
9
Hospital-acquired infection surveillance in a neurosurgical intensive care unit.神经外科重症监护病房的医院获得性感染监测
J Hosp Infect. 2006 Sep;64(1):23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.02.022. Epub 2006 Jul 11.
10
Risk factors and impact of nosocomial Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infections in the adult intensive care unit: a case-control study.成人重症监护病房医院获得性鲍曼不动杆菌血流感染的危险因素及影响:一项病例对照研究
J Hosp Infect. 2009 Oct;73(2):143-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.06.007. Epub 2009 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and clinical implications of bloodstream infections in intensive care patients with or without burn injury: a retrospective cohort study.重症监护患者中有无烧伤感染的血流感染的患病率和临床意义:一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Sep;43(9):1731-1740. doi: 10.1007/s10096-024-04877-w. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
2
Dynamic monitoring of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, APACHE II score, and SOFA score predict prognosis and drug resistance in patients with complex bloodstream infection: a single-center retrospective study.动态监测中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值、APACHE II评分和SOFA评分预测复杂性血流感染患者的预后和耐药性:一项单中心回顾性研究
Front Microbiol. 2024 Jan 23;15:1296059. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1296059. eCollection 2024.
3
AlgR Phosphorylation Status Differentially Regulates Pyocyanin and Pyoverdine Production.AlgR 的磷酸化状态差异调节绿脓菌素和吡咯并喹啉醌的产生。
mBio. 2018 Jan 30;9(1):e02318-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02318-17.
4
Late onset sepsis in newborn babies: epidemiology and effect of a bundle to prevent central line associated bloodstream infections in the neonatal intensive care unit.新生儿晚发型败血症:新生儿重症监护病房中预防中心静脉导管相关血流感染集束化措施的流行病学及效果
Braz J Infect Dis. 2015 Jan-Feb;19(1):52-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
5
The Pseudomonas aeruginosa AlgZR two-component system coordinates multiple phenotypes.铜绿假单胞菌AlgZR双组分系统协调多种表型。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014 Jun 20;4:82. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00082. eCollection 2014.