Suppr超能文献

患者对哮喘特异性生活质量问卷的看法:德国的定性访谈研究

Patients' views on asthma-specific quality of life questionnaires: qualitative interview study in Germany.

作者信息

Apfelbacher Christian, Weiss Melanie, Saur Joachim, Smith Helen, Loerbroks Adrian

机构信息

Division of Public Health and Primary Care, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Brighton, Falmer, UK.

出版信息

J Asthma. 2012 Oct;49(8):875-83. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2012.713427. Epub 2012 Aug 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

It is unclear which of the commonly used asthma-specific quality of life (QoL) questionnaires best capture the lived experience of people with asthma. The objective of this study was to explore patients' views on three asthma-specific QoL questionnaires.

METHODS

Ten adult individuals with asthma were asked to complete three asthma-specific QoL questionnaires (Standardized Juniper Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ-J-s), Sydney Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ-S), and Fragebogen zur Lebensqualität bei Asthma (FLA)). Interviews were conducted to elicit patients' views on the questionnaires. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematic content analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Participants spoke about response format and options, missing and redundant/similar content as well as content that was perceived to be irrelevant. A lack of specificity was named for some items, and issues concerning layout were raised. Despite the diversity of views expressed, participants mostly agreed on the ranking of the questionnaires and, overall, favored the AQLQ-S.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient involvement highlights shortcomings and strengths of various asthma-specific questionnaires in terms of both format and content. The AQLQ-S was the most positively perceived questionnaire. Future research will need to explore other settings and potentially involve a larger and more diverse sample.

摘要

目的

尚不清楚哪种常用的哮喘特异性生活质量(QoL)问卷能最好地反映哮喘患者的实际生活体验。本研究的目的是探讨患者对三种哮喘特异性QoL问卷的看法。

方法

邀请10名成年哮喘患者完成三种哮喘特异性QoL问卷(标准化朱尼珀哮喘生活质量问卷(AQLQ-J-s)、悉尼哮喘生活质量问卷(AQLQ-S)和哮喘生活质量问卷(FLA))。进行访谈以了解患者对问卷的看法。访谈内容逐字记录,并进行主题内容分析。

结果

参与者谈到了回答格式和选项、缺失及冗余/相似的内容以及被认为不相关的内容。一些项目被指出缺乏特异性,还提出了有关问卷布局的问题。尽管观点多样,但参与者大多对问卷的排名达成一致,总体上更青睐AQLQ-S。

结论

患者的参与凸显了各种哮喘特异性问卷在格式和内容方面的优缺点。AQLQ-S是认可度最高的问卷。未来的研究需要探索其他环境,并可能纳入更大、更多样化的样本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验