B. Braun Medical Ltd, Sempach, Switzerland.
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2012 Sep;25(9):404-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000419405.52570.3e.
The primary objective of this study was to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of polihexanide 0.02% and 0.04% with chlorhexidine 0.05% after 30 minutes of topical treatment on healthy intact skin.
This study was performed as a double-blind, randomized, comparator-controlled, 3-arm, crossover study.
: A phase I dermatological study unit.
Twenty healthy volunteers with intact skin.
: Test areas of 5 cm on the subjects' arms were treated with the investigational products using a polyurethane swab. Skin swabs were taken before and after treatment for quantitative microbial evaluation.
The main outcome measure was the log reduction factor of colony-forming units on the skin after 30 minutes of treatment.
No statistically significant difference was seen between both of the polihexanide test products (mean lgRF polihexanide 0.02%, 1.2251 [SD, 0.9399]; mean lgRF polihexanide 0.04%, 1.8991 [SD, 0.88]) and the comparator, chlorhexidine 0.05% (P > .1).
The results of this study indicate that polihexanide is a suitable alternative to chlorhexidine for skin and wound antisepsis.
本研究的主要目的是比较聚己定 0.02%和 0.04%与氯己定 0.05%在 30 分钟局部处理健康完整皮肤后的抗菌效果。
这是一项双盲、随机、对照、三臂、交叉研究。
一期皮肤科研究单位。
20 名皮肤完整的健康志愿者。
使用聚氨酯棉签对受试者手臂上的 5 厘米测试区域进行处理,使用研究产品。在治疗前后采集皮肤拭子进行定量微生物评估。
主要观察指标是治疗 30 分钟后皮肤单位菌落形成数的对数减少因子。
两种聚己定测试产品(聚己定 0.02%的平均 lgRF,1.2251[SD,0.9399];聚己定 0.04%的平均 lgRF,1.8991[SD,0.88])和比较剂氯己定 0.05%之间没有统计学上的显著差异(P>.1)。
本研究结果表明,聚己定是皮肤和伤口消毒的氯己定的合适替代品。