Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maimonides Medical Center, SUNY Downstate, New York, New York 11219, USA.
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Sep;120(3):647-9. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318265e101.
Many states have proposed or enacted laws that mandate that women undergo ultrasonography before electing pregnancy termination. In some cases, the legislation prescribes the form of ultrasound examination, requires that a woman review the images produced, or both. Although ultrasonography may be a part of good and standard care before many abortion procedures, we argue that legislating imaging procedures inappropriately limits women's autonomy and undermines the physician-patient relationship as well as the physician's professional obligations to the patient. The timing, context, and way in which ultrasonography, or any medical test, is used and viewed should be decisions made between patient and provider, not decisions scripted by law.
许多州已经提出或颁布法律,要求女性在选择终止妊娠前进行超声检查。在某些情况下,立法规定了超声检查的形式,要求女性查看所产生的图像,或者两者兼而有之。虽然超声检查可能是许多堕胎程序之前的良好和标准护理的一部分,但我们认为,将成像程序立法不当限制了妇女的自主权,并破坏了医患关系以及医生对患者的专业义务。超声检查或任何其他医疗测试的使用和查看的时间、背景和方式应该是患者和提供者之间做出的决定,而不是由法律规定的决定。