Division of Frontier Materials Science, Graduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Japan.
Chemistry. 2012 Oct 1;18(40):12814-24. doi: 10.1002/chem.201201061. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
A new class of propel- ler-shaped compound (4), which consisted of dehydrobenzo[14]annulene ([14]DBA) blades, as well as its naphtho homologues (5 and 6), have been prepared. Although NMR studies of compound 4 did not provide useful information regarding its conformation in solution, DFT calculations with different functionals and the 6-31G* basis set all indicated that the D(3)-symmetric structure was energetically more favorable than the C(2) conformer. From X-ray crystallographic analysis, it appeared that compound 4 adopted a propeller-shaped-, approximately D(3)-symmetric structure in the solid state, in which the [14]DBA blades were twisted substantially owing to steric repulsion between the neighboring benzene rings. On the contrary, in the case of compound 6, although the DFT calculations with the B3LYP functional predicted that the D(3)-symmetric conformation was more stable, calculations with the M05 and M05-2X functionals indicated that the C(2) conformer was more favorable because of π-π interactions between the naphthalene units of a pair of neighboring blades. Indeed, X-ray analysis of compound 6 showed that it adopted an approximately C(2)-symmetric conformation. Moreover, on the basis of variable-temperature (1)H NMR measurements, we found that compound 6 adopted a C(2) conformation and the barrier for interconversion between the C(2)-C(2) conformers was estimated to be 16.2 kcal mol(-1); however, no indication of the presence of the D(3) isomer was obtained. The relatively small energy barriers to interconversion, despite the large overlapping of neighboring blades, was ascribed to the flexibility of the acetylene linkages, which could be deformed substantially in the transition state of the ring-flip.
一种新型推进器形状的化合物(4),由去氢苯并[14]轮烯([14]DBA)叶片以及其萘同系物(5 和 6)组成,已经被制备出来。尽管对化合物 4 的 NMR 研究没有提供关于其在溶液中构象的有用信息,但使用不同函数和 6-31G*基组的 DFT 计算都表明,D(3)对称结构在能量上比 C(2)构象更有利。从 X 射线晶体学分析来看,化合物 4 在固态中似乎采用了一种推进器形状的、近似 D(3)对称的结构,其中[14]DBA 叶片由于相邻苯环之间的空间排斥而发生了很大的扭曲。相反,在化合物 6 的情况下,尽管 B3LYP 函数的 DFT 计算预测 D(3)对称构象更稳定,但 M05 和 M05-2X 函数的计算表明,由于一对相邻叶片的萘单元之间存在π-π相互作用,C(2)构象更有利。事实上,化合物 6 的 X 射线分析表明它采用了近似 C(2)对称的构象。此外,基于变温(1)H NMR 测量,我们发现化合物 6 采用 C(2)构象,并且 C(2)-C(2)构象之间的互变异构体的能垒估计为 16.2 kcal mol(-1);然而,没有获得 D(3)异构体存在的迹象。尽管相邻叶片重叠较大,但互变异构体之间的能垒相对较小,这归因于乙炔键的灵活性,在环翻转的过渡态中,乙炔键可以发生很大的变形。