Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Magn Reson Med. 2013 Jul;70(1):97-105. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24437. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
In coronary magnetic resonance angiography, a magnetization-preparation scheme for T2-weighting (T2Prep) is widely used to enhance contrast between the coronary blood-pool and the myocardium. This prepulse is commonly applied without spatial selection to minimize flow sensitivity, but the nonselective implementation results in a reduced magnetization of the in-flowing blood and a related penalty in signal-to-noise ratio. It is hypothesized that a spatially selective T2Prep would leave the magnetization of blood outside the T2Prep volume unaffected and thereby lower the signal-to-noise ratio penalty. To test this hypothesis, a spatially selective T2Prep was implemented where the user could freely adjust angulation and position of the T2Prep slab to avoid covering the ventricular blood-pool and saturating the in-flowing spins. A time gap of 150 ms was further added between the T2Prep and other prepulses to allow for in-flow of a larger volume of unsaturated spins. Consistent with numerical simulation, the spatially selective T2Prep increased in vivo human coronary artery signal-to-noise ratio (42.3 ± 2.9 vs. 31.4 ± 2.2, n = 22, P < 0.0001) and contrast-to-noise-ratio (18.6 ± 1.5 vs. 13.9 ± 1.2, P = 0.009) as compared to those of the nonselective T2Prep. Additionally, a segmental analysis demonstrated that the spatially selective T2Prep was most beneficial in proximal and mid segments where the in-flowing blood volume was largest compared to the distal segments.
在冠状动脉磁共振血管造影中,广泛使用 T2 加权的磁化准备方案(T2Prep)来增强冠状动脉血池和心肌之间的对比度。这个预脉冲通常没有空间选择地应用,以最小化流动敏感性,但非选择性的实现导致流入血液的磁化降低,并在信噪比方面产生相关的惩罚。假设空间选择性 T2Prep 将不受 T2Prep 体积内的血液磁化影响,从而降低信噪比的惩罚。为了验证这一假设,实现了空间选择性 T2Prep,用户可以自由调整 T2Prep 板的角度和位置,以避免覆盖心室血池并饱和流入的自旋。在 T2Prep 和其他预脉冲之间进一步添加 150ms 的时间间隔,以允许更多未饱和的自旋流入。与数值模拟一致,与非选择性 T2Prep 相比,空间选择性 T2Prep 增加了体内人类冠状动脉的信噪比(42.3±2.9 与 31.4±2.2,n=22,P<0.0001)和对比噪声比(18.6±1.5 与 13.9±1.2,P=0.009)。此外,节段分析表明,与远端节段相比,在流入血量最大的近端和中段,空间选择性 T2Prep 最有益。