Koninklijk Instituut voor de Tropen/Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Nov;50(11):3520-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01426-12. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
Declining malaria transmission and known difficulties with current diagnostic tools for malaria, such as microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) in particular at low parasite densities, still warrant the search for sensitive diagnostic tests. Molecular tests need substantial simplification before implementation in clinical settings in countries where malaria is endemic. Direct blood PCR (db-PCR), circumventing DNA extraction, to detect Plasmodium was developed and adapted to be visualized by nucleic acid lateral flow immunoassay (NALFIA). The assay was evaluated in the laboratory against samples from confirmed Sudanese patients (n = 51), returning travelers (n = 214), samples from the Dutch Blood Bank (n = 100), and in the field in Burkina Faso (n = 283) and Thailand (n = 381) on suspected malaria cases and compared to RDT and microscopy. The sensitivity and specificity of db-PCR-NALFIA compared to the initial diagnosis in the laboratory were 94.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.909 to 0.969) and 97.4% (95% CI = 0.909 to 0.969), respectively. In Burkina Faso, the sensitivity was 94.8% (95% CI = 0.88.7 to 97.9%), and the specificity was 82.4% (95% CI = 75.4 to 87.7%) compared to microscopy and 93.3% (95% CI = 87.4 to 96.7%) and 91.4% (95% CI = 85.2 to 95.3%) compared to RDT. In Thailand, the sensitivity and specificity were 93.4% (CI = 86.4 to 97.1%) and 90.9 (95% CI = 86.7 to 93.9%), respectively, compared to microscopy and 95.6% (95% CI = 88.5 to 98.6%) and 87.1% (95% CI = 82.5 to 90.6) compared to RDT. db-PCR-NALFIA is highly sensitive and specific for easy and rapid detection of Plasmodium parasites and can be easily used in countries where malaria is endemic. The inability of the device to discriminate Plasmodium species requires further investigation.
疟疾传播率下降,以及当前疟疾诊断工具(尤其是在低寄生虫密度时的显微镜检查和快速诊断检测)存在已知困难,仍然需要寻找更敏感的诊断检测方法。在疟疾流行的国家,分子检测需要大量简化,才能在临床环境中实施。为了检测疟原虫,开发了一种绕过 DNA 提取的直接血液 PCR(db-PCR),并将其适配为核酸侧向流动免疫测定(NALFIA)进行可视化。该检测方法在实验室中对来自苏丹确诊患者(n=51)、返回旅行者(n=214)、荷兰血液银行样本(n=100)的样本进行了评估,并在布基纳法索(n=283)和泰国(n=381)的疑似疟疾病例中进行了现场评估,并与 RDT 和显微镜检查进行了比较。db-PCR-NALFIA 与实验室初始诊断相比的灵敏度和特异性分别为 94.4%(95%置信区间[CI]:0.909 至 0.969)和 97.4%(95%CI:0.909 至 0.969)。在布基纳法索,与显微镜相比,该检测方法的灵敏度为 94.8%(95%CI:0.88.7 至 97.9%),特异性为 82.4%(95%CI:0.75.4 至 87.7%),与 RDT 相比,灵敏度为 93.3%(95%CI:87.4%至 96.7%),特异性为 91.4%(95%CI:85.2%至 95.3%)。在泰国,与显微镜相比,该检测方法的灵敏度和特异性分别为 93.4%(95%CI:86.4%至 97.1%)和 90.9%(95%CI:86.7%至 93.9%),与 RDT 相比,灵敏度和特异性分别为 95.6%(95%CI:88.5%至 98.6%)和 87.1%(95%CI:82.5%至 90.6%)。db-PCR-NALFIA 易于操作且快速,可高度敏感和特异性地检测疟原虫寄生虫,可在疟疾流行的国家中轻松使用。该设备无法区分疟原虫种类,这需要进一步调查。