Koumaras George M
Delta Dental of Virginia, Roanoke, VA 24018, USA.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Sep;70(9 Suppl 1):S8-10. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.04.023.
The purpose of this study was to estimate the treatment costs directly related to operative and nonoperative management of asymptomatic, disease-free, third molar (M3) teeth.
The data reviewed were limited to claims submitted by oral and maxillofacial surgeons. The data collected included charges for consultations, radiographs, surgical removal of bony impacted teeth, and general anesthesia, using the 2009 data extracts from Delta Dental of Virginia. The median charges were used as a proxy for the actual costs attributable to the removal or retention of M3 teeth. Three clinical scenarios were executed using the available claims data to calculate the treatment costs associated with nonoperative and operative M3 management. An assumption made in the computation of expenses was that for subjects who elected to retain their M3s, the recommended management strategy was active surveillance. Active surveillance is a prescribed treatment to monitor the retained M3s characterized by performing a clinical examination and panoramic imaging every 2 years. The author assumed a 3% increase in charges per annum.
The 3 scenarios were as follows: scenario 1 (nonoperative management), retention of asymptomatic, disease-free M3s and monitoring for 20 years from age 18 to 38 years; scenario 2 (operative management), removal of 2 asymptomatic, disease-free, bony impacted M3s for 18-year-old patients using general anesthesia (30 minutes) in an office-based ambulatory setting; and scenario 3 (failure of non-operative management), removal of 1 previously asymptomatic, disease-free, bony impacted M3 after 10 years of follow-up in a now 28-year-old patient using general anesthesia (30 minutes) in an office-based ambulatory setting. The estimated charges for managing M3s were $2,342, $1,184, and $1,997 for scenarios 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
A simplified financial analysis derived from the dental claims data suggests that during the course of the patient's lifetime, the charges associated with non-operative management of asymptomatic, disease-free M3s will exceed the charges of operative management. The difference in costs might be important to patients when choosing between operative and non-operative management of their M3s.
本研究旨在估算与无症状、无疾病的第三磨牙(M3)的手术和非手术治疗直接相关的治疗成本。
所审查的数据仅限于口腔颌面外科医生提交的索赔申请。收集的数据包括会诊费、X光检查费、骨埋伏牙的手术拔除费和全身麻醉费,数据来源于弗吉尼亚三角洲牙科2009年的数据摘录。中位数费用被用作M3牙拔除或保留实际成本的替代指标。利用现有的索赔数据执行了三种临床情景,以计算与非手术和手术治疗M3相关的治疗成本。费用计算中的一个假设是,对于选择保留其M3的受试者,推荐的管理策略是积极监测。积极监测是一种规定的治疗方法,用于监测保留的M3,其特征是每2年进行一次临床检查和全景成像。作者假设每年费用增长3%。
三种情景如下:情景1(非手术治疗),保留无症状、无疾病的M3,并从18岁至38岁进行20年监测;情景2(手术治疗),在门诊环境中为18岁患者使用全身麻醉(30分钟)拔除2颗无症状、无疾病的骨埋伏M3;情景3(非手术治疗失败),在一名28岁患者随访10年后,在门诊环境中使用全身麻醉(30分钟)拔除1颗先前无症状、无疾病的骨埋伏M3。情景1、2和3中管理M3的估计费用分别为2342美元、1184美元和1997美元。
从牙科索赔数据得出的简化财务分析表明,在患者的一生中,与无症状、无疾病的M3非手术治疗相关的费用将超过手术治疗的费用。在选择M3的手术和非手术治疗时,成本差异对患者可能很重要。