Prosthetic Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, London, SE1 9RT.
Br Dent J. 2012 Aug;213(4):153-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.721.
Peer review is an important stage in academic publishing, as a form of quality control to maintain the integrity of both the articles and the journals they appear in. However, the confidential nature of the relationship between reviewer and author does not necessarily benefit the system; with some reviewers using their anonymity to give unnecessary, injudicious comment. This paper explores the motives behind the reviewer's comments and how peer review could be improved by openness and honesty.
同行评审是学术出版的重要阶段,是一种质量控制形式,旨在维护文章及其所在期刊的完整性。然而,评审员和作者之间的保密关系不一定有利于该系统;一些评审员利用其匿名性发表不必要的、不明智的评论。本文探讨了评审员评论背后的动机,以及如何通过公开和诚实来改进同行评审。