Suppr超能文献

同行评议:基于作者和评审经验的观点。

Peer review: a view based on recent experience as an author and reviewer.

机构信息

Prosthetic Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, London, SE1 9RT.

出版信息

Br Dent J. 2012 Aug;213(4):153-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.721.

Abstract

Peer review is an important stage in academic publishing, as a form of quality control to maintain the integrity of both the articles and the journals they appear in. However, the confidential nature of the relationship between reviewer and author does not necessarily benefit the system; with some reviewers using their anonymity to give unnecessary, injudicious comment. This paper explores the motives behind the reviewer's comments and how peer review could be improved by openness and honesty.

摘要

同行评审是学术出版的重要阶段,是一种质量控制形式,旨在维护文章及其所在期刊的完整性。然而,评审员和作者之间的保密关系不一定有利于该系统;一些评审员利用其匿名性发表不必要的、不明智的评论。本文探讨了评审员评论背后的动机,以及如何通过公开和诚实来改进同行评审。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验