• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管多普勒监测测量的每搏量变异度预测手术期间液体反应性的能力。

Ability of stroke volume variation measured by oesophageal Doppler monitoring to predict fluid responsiveness during surgery.

机构信息

Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Department, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens 80054, France.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2013 Jan;110(1):28-33. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes301. Epub 2012 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1093/bja/aes301
PMID:22918700
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to test whether non-invasive assessment of respiratory stroke volume variation (ΔrespSV) by oesophageal Doppler monitoring (ODM) can predict fluid responsiveness during surgery in a mixed population. The predictive value of ΔrespSV was evaluated using a grey zone approach.

METHODS

Ninety patients monitored using ODM who required i.v. fluids to expand their circulating volume during surgery under general anaesthesia were studied. Patients with a preoperative arrhythmia, right ventricular failure, frequent ectopic beats, or breathing spontaneously were excluded. Haemodynamic variables and oesophageal Doppler indices [peak velocity (PV), stroke volume (SV), corrected flow time (FTc), cardiac output (CO), ΔrespSV, and respiratory variation of PV (ΔrespPV)] were measured before and after fluid expansion. Responders were defined by a >15% increase in SV after infusion of 500 ml crystalloid solution.

RESULTS

SV was increased by ≥15% after 500 ml crystalloid infusion in 53 (59%) of the 90 patients. ΔrespSV predicted fluid responsiveness with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUC) curve of 0.91 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.85-0.97, P<0.0001]. The optimal ΔrespSV cut-off was 14.4% (95% CI: 14.3-14.5%). The grey zone approach identified 12 patients (14%) with a range of ΔrespSV values between 14% and 15%. FTc was not predictive of fluid responsiveness (AUC 0.49, 95% CI: 0.37-0.62, P=0.84).

CONCLUSIONS

ΔrespSV predicted fluid responsiveness accurately during surgery over a ΔrespSV range between 14% and 15%. In contrast, FTc did not predict fluid responsiveness.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在检验通过食道多普勒监测(ODM)无创评估呼吸每搏量变异度(ΔrespSV)是否可以预测混合人群手术中的液体反应性。采用灰色地带方法评估了ΔrespSV 的预测价值。

方法

研究纳入了 90 例在全身麻醉下手术期间需要静脉补液来扩充循环血量的 ODM 监测患者。排除术前心律失常、右心衰竭、频发异位搏动或自主呼吸的患者。测量液体扩充前后的血流动力学变量和食道多普勒指数[峰值速度(PV)、每搏量(SV)、校正流量时间(FTc)、心输出量(CO)、ΔrespSV 和呼吸 PV 变异度(ΔrespPV)]。以输液 500ml 晶体溶液后 SV 增加≥15%为有反应者。

结果

90 例患者中,53 例(59%)SV 在 500ml 晶体液输注后增加≥15%。ΔrespSV 预测液体反应性的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.91 [95%置信区间(95%CI):0.85-0.97,P<0.0001]。ΔrespSV 的最佳截断值为 14.4%(95%CI:14.3-14.5%)。灰色地带方法确定了 12 例(14%)ΔrespSV 值在 14%-15%之间的患者。FTc 对液体反应性无预测价值(AUC 0.49,95%CI:0.37-0.62,P=0.84)。

结论

ΔrespSV 在 14%-15%的ΔrespSV 范围内准确预测手术中的液体反应性。相比之下,FTc 不能预测液体反应性。

相似文献

1
Ability of stroke volume variation measured by oesophageal Doppler monitoring to predict fluid responsiveness during surgery.食管多普勒监测测量的每搏量变异度预测手术期间液体反应性的能力。
Br J Anaesth. 2013 Jan;110(1):28-33. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes301. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
2
Respiratory stroke volume variation assessed by oesophageal Doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness during laparoscopy.食管多普勒监测评估的呼吸 stroke volume 变化可预测腹腔镜检查期间的液体反应性。
Br J Anaesth. 2014 Apr;112(4):660-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet430. Epub 2013 Dec 22.
3
End-expiratory occlusion manoeuvre does not accurately predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre.呼气末阻断法不能准确预测手术室中的液体反应性。
Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jun;112(6):1050-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet582. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
4
The predictability of dynamic preload indices depends on the volume of fluid challenge: A prospective observational study in the operating theater.动态预负荷指标的可预测性取决于液体冲击量:一项在手术室进行的前瞻性观察研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(42):e12848. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012848.
5
Stroke volume changes induced by a recruitment maneuver predict fluid responsiveness in patients with protective ventilation in the operating theater.在手术室进行保护性通气的患者中,由肺复张手法引起的每搏输出量变化可预测液体反应性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jul;95(28):e4259. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004259.
6
Stroke volume optimization in elective bowel surgery: a comparison between pulse power wave analysis (LiDCOrapid) and oesophageal Doppler (CardioQ).择期肠道手术中的每搏量优化:脉搏功率波分析(LiDCOrapid)与食道多普勒(CardioQ)的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2013 Mar;110(3):374-80. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes399. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
7
Validation of pulse pressure variation and corrected flow time as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients in the prone position.验证脉压变异和校正流量时间对俯卧位患者液体反应性的预测价值。
Br J Anaesth. 2013 May;110(5):713-20. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes475. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
8
Mini-fluid challenge predicts fluid responsiveness during spontaneous breathing under spinal anaesthesia: An observational study.小剂量液体激发试验可预测脊髓麻醉下自主呼吸时的液体反应性:一项观察性研究。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Sep;32(9):645-9. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000175.
9
Carotid ultrasound measurements for assessing fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients: corrected flow time and respirophasic variation in blood flow peak velocity.颈动脉超声测量评估自主呼吸患者液体反应性:校正的血流时间和血流速度呼吸相位变化。
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Sep;121(3):541-549. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.12.047. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
10
Pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in colorectal surgery.脉压变异指数预测结直肠手术中的液体反应性。
Anesth Analg. 2011 Nov;113(5):1058-63. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822c10cd. Epub 2011 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of patient position changes on advanced hemodynamic indices in laparoscopic and open major abdominal cancer surgeries: retrospective study.患者体位改变对腹腔镜和开放性腹部大手术中高级血流动力学指标的影响:回顾性研究
BMC Surg. 2025 Aug 6;25(1):341. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03064-8.
2
Non-invasive assessment of Pulse Wave Transit Time (PWTT) is a poor predictor for intraoperative fluid responsiveness: a prospective observational trial (best-PWTT study).脉搏波传导时间(PWTT)的无创评估预测术中液体反应性的效果较差:一项前瞻性观察性试验(最佳 PWTT 研究)。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Feb 27;23(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02016-0.
3
Echocardiographic measure of dynamic arterial elastance predict pressure response during norepinephrine weaning: an observational study.
超声心动图测量动态动脉弹性可预测去甲肾上腺素停药期间的血压反应:一项观察性研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 2;11(1):2853. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82408-9.
4
Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness by Stroke Volume Variation in Children Undergoing Fontan Operation.预测行 Fontan 手术患儿的液体反应性通过每搏量变异度。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Nov 7;2020:2595960. doi: 10.1155/2020/2595960. eCollection 2020.
5
The tidal volume challenge improves the reliability of dynamic preload indices during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position with lung-protective ventilation.在采用肺保护性通气的体位下,潮气量挑战可提高机器人辅助腹腔镜手术中动态前负荷指数的可靠性。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Aug 7;19(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0807-6.
6
The predictability of dynamic preload indices depends on the volume of fluid challenge: A prospective observational study in the operating theater.动态预负荷指标的可预测性取决于液体冲击量:一项在手术室进行的前瞻性观察研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(42):e12848. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012848.
7
What is the impact of the fluid challenge technique on diagnosis of fluid responsiveness? A systematic review and meta-analysis.液体冲击技术对液体反应性诊断的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2017 Aug 4;21(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1796-9.
8
Assessing volume status and fluid responsiveness in the emergency department.急诊科容量状态及液体反应性评估
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2014 Dec 31;1(2):67-77. doi: 10.15441/ceem.14.040. eCollection 2014 Dec.
9
Stroke volume changes induced by a recruitment maneuver predict fluid responsiveness in patients with protective ventilation in the operating theater.在手术室进行保护性通气的患者中,由肺复张手法引起的每搏输出量变化可预测液体反应性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jul;95(28):e4259. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004259.
10
Intravascular volume therapy in adults: Guidelines from the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany.成人血管内容量治疗:德国科学医学协会指南
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Jul;33(7):488-521. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000447.