使用最小临床重要差异（MCID）评估颞下颌关节紊乱病（TMJMD）患者的治疗结果：一项初步研究（）
USE OF THE MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE (MCID) FOR EVALUATING TREATMENT OUTCOMES WITH TMJMD PATIENTS: A PRELIMINARY STUDY().
作者信息
Ingram Megan, Choi Yun Hee, Chiu Chung-Yi, Haggard Rob, Dougall Angela Liegey, Buschang Peter, Gatchel Robert J
出版信息
J Appl Biobehav Res. 2011 Dec 1;16(3-4):148-166. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9861.2011.00068.x. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
Abstract
Temporomandibular joint and muscle disorder (TMJMD) is one of the most prevalent types of musculoskeletal disorders. The major goal of the study was to more objectively quantify clinically meaningful relief for TMJMD treatment outcomes by using the new metric of minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Pre- to post-treatment changes on a number of self-report measures were evaluated in a cohort of 101 acute TMJMD patients. An anchor-based MCID approach was employed, with an objective chewing performance measure serving as the clinical outcome of interest. Using a Receiver Operating Curve analysis, it was found that the Physical Component Scale (PCS) of the SF-36 was the most robust self-report measure to use as the MCID in a TMJMD patient population.
摘要
颞下颌关节及肌肉紊乱症（TMJMD）是最常见的肌肉骨骼疾病类型之一。该研究的主要目标是通过使用最小临床重要差异（MCID）这一新指标，更客观地量化TMJMD治疗结果中具有临床意义的缓解情况。在一组101例急性TMJMD患者中，评估了多种自我报告测量指标从治疗前到治疗后的变化。采用了基于锚定的MCID方法，将客观咀嚼性能测量作为感兴趣的临床结果。通过受试者工作特征曲线分析发现，SF-36的身体成分量表（PCS）是在TMJMD患者群体中用作MCID的最可靠自我报告测量指标。
相似文献
1
USE OF THE MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE (MCID) FOR EVALUATING TREATMENT OUTCOMES WITH TMJMD PATIENTS: A PRELIMINARY STUDY().使用最小临床重要差异（MCID）评估颞下颌关节紊乱病（TMJMD）患者的治疗结果：一项初步研究（）
J Appl Biobehav Res. 2011 Dec 1;16(3-4):148-166. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9861.2011.00068.x. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
2
What Are the Minimum Clinically Important Differences in SF-36 Scores in Patients with Orthopaedic Oncologic Conditions?骨科肿瘤患者 SF-36 评分的最小临床重要差异是多少？
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Sep;478(9):2148-2158. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001341.
3
Preoperative Short Form Health Survey Score Is Predictive of Return to Play and Minimal Clinically Important Difference at a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.术前简短健康调查评分可预测前交叉韧带重建术后至少2年随访时的重返运动情况及最小临床重要差异。
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Oct;45(12):2784-2790. doi: 10.1177/0363546517714472. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
4
Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum?测试最小临床重要差异：共识还是难题？
Spine J. 2010 Apr;10(4):321-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.10.015.
5
Establishing minimum clinically important difference for patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing lateral lumbar interbody fusion.建立接受侧路腰椎间融合术患者的患者报告结局测量的最小临床重要差异。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Feb;165(2):325-334. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05428-y. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
6
Determination of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in pain, disability, and quality of life after revision fusion for symptomatic pseudoarthrosis.评估翻修融合术后因症状性假关节而导致的疼痛、残疾和生活质量的最小临床重要差异（MCID）。
Spine J. 2012 Dec;12(12):1122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
7
Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后疼痛、残疾和生活质量的最小临床重要差异评估：临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Feb;18(2):154-60. doi: 10.3171/2012.10.SPINE12312. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
8
Minimal clinically important difference in patients who underwent decompression alone for lumbar degenerative disease.仅接受减压治疗的腰椎退行性疾病患者的最小临床重要差异。
Spine J. 2022 Apr;22(4):549-560. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.10.010. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
9
Minimum Clinically Important Difference in SF-36 Scores for Use in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.SF-36 评分用于退行性颈脊髓病的最小临床重要差异。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Nov 1;43(21):E1260-E1266. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002684.
10
Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion.颈椎融合术后，颈椎残障指数、36 项简短健康调查量表躯体成分概括、颈痛和臂痛量表的最小临床重要差异和显著临床获益。
Spine J. 2010 Jun;10(6):469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
引用本文的文献
1
Cross-Cultural Validation of the Thai Oral Health Impact Profile for Temporomandibular Disorders.跨文化验证泰国颞下颌关节紊乱病口腔健康影响量表。
Int Dent J. 2024 Aug;74(4):777-783. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.01.010. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
2
The anchor design of anchor-based method to determine the minimal clinically important difference: a systematic review.基于锚定的方法确定最小临床重要差异的锚点设计：系统评价。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Jul 15;21(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02157-3.
3
Minimal clinically important difference of mouth opening in oral submucous fibrosis patients: a retrospective study.口腔黏膜下纤维化患者开口度的最小临床重要差异：一项回顾性研究。
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Jun 30;48(3):167-173. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2022.48.3.167.
4
Taking Charge after Stroke: A randomized controlled trial of a person-centered, self-directed rehabilitation intervention.脑卒中后管理：一项以患者为中心、自我导向的康复干预的随机对照试验。
Int J Stroke. 2020 Dec;15(9):954-964. doi: 10.1177/1747493020915144. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
5
Acupuncture treatment on the motor area of the scalp for motor dysfunction in patients with ischemic stroke: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.针刺头皮运动区治疗缺血性脑卒中患者运动功能障碍：一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Jun 20;18(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2000-x.
6
Change in quality of life and one-year mortality risk in maintenance dialysis patients.维持性透析患者的生活质量变化及一年死亡风险
Qual Life Res. 2016 Sep;25(9):2295-306. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1257-y. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
本文引用的文献
1
What does/should the minimum clinically important difference measure? A reconsideration of its clinical value in evaluating efficacy of lumbar fusion surgery.最小临床重要差异测量的是什么？重新考虑其在评估腰椎融合手术疗效中的临床价值。
Clin J Pain. 2012 Jun;28(5):387-97. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182327f20.
2
Temporomandibular disorders and associated clinical comorbidities.颞下颌关节紊乱病及其相关临床共病。
Clin J Pain. 2011 Mar-Apr;27(3):268-74. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31820215f5.
3
IMMPACT recommendations for clinical trials: opportunities for the RDC/TMD.IMMPACT 临床试验建议：RDC/TMD 的机会。
J Oral Rehabil. 2010 Oct;37(10):799-806. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02152.x.
4
Minimal clinically important difference.最小临床重要差异
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Sep 1;35(19):1739-43. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d3cfc9.
5
Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum?测试最小临床重要差异：共识还是难题？
Spine J. 2010 Apr;10(4):321-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.10.015.
6
The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. I: overview and methodology for assessment of validity.颞下颌关节紊乱病的研究诊断标准。I：有效性评估的概述与方法
J Orofac Pain. 2010 Winter;24(1):7-24.
7
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research.国立牙科与颅面研究所
Int J Dent Hyg. 2008 Aug;6(3):249. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2008.00329.x.
8
Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.解读慢性疼痛临床试验中治疗结果的临床重要性：IMMPACT 建议
J Pain. 2008 Feb;9(2):105-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.09.005. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
9
The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: scientific advances and future directions.慢性疼痛的生物心理社会方法：科学进展与未来方向。
Psychol Bull. 2007 Jul;133(4):581-624. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.581.
10
Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods.理解最小临床重要差异：概念与方法综述
Spine J. 2007 Sep-Oct;7(5):541-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.01.008. Epub 2007 Apr 2.
Zotero 插件