Suppr超能文献

主动脉内球囊反搏支持用于伴心原性休克的心肌梗死。

Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.

机构信息

University of Leipzig-Heart Center, Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2012 Oct 4;367(14):1287-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1208410. Epub 2012 Aug 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In current international guidelines, intraaortic balloon counterpulsation is considered to be a class I treatment for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. However, evidence is based mainly on registry data, and there is a paucity of randomized clinical trials.

METHODS

In this randomized, prospective, open-label, multicenter trial, we randomly assigned 600 patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction to intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP group, 301 patients) or no intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (control group, 299 patients). All patients were expected to undergo early revascularization (by means of percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass surgery) and to receive the best available medical therapy. The primary efficacy end point was 30-day all-cause mortality. Safety assessments included major bleeding, peripheral ischemic complications, sepsis, and stroke.

RESULTS

A total of 300 patients in the IABP group and 298 in the control group were included in the analysis of the primary end point. At 30 days, 119 patients in the IABP group (39.7%) and 123 patients in the control group (41.3%) had died (relative risk with IABP, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.79 to 1.17; P=0.69). There were no significant differences in secondary end points or in process-of-care measures, including the time to hemodynamic stabilization, the length of stay in the intensive care unit, serum lactate levels, the dose and duration of catecholamine therapy, and renal function. The IABP group and the control group did not differ significantly with respect to the rates of major bleeding (3.3% and 4.4%, respectively; P=0.51), peripheral ischemic complications (4.3% and 3.4%, P=0.53), sepsis (15.7% and 20.5%, P=0.15), and stroke (0.7% and 1.7%, P=0.28).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation did not significantly reduce 30-day mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction for whom an early revascularization strategy was planned. (Funded by the German Research Foundation and others; IABP-SHOCK II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00491036.).

摘要

背景

在当前的国际指南中,主动脉内球囊反搏被认为是治疗急性心肌梗死后合并心源性休克的 I 类治疗方法。然而,证据主要基于登记数据,随机临床试验较少。

方法

在这项随机、前瞻性、开放标签、多中心试验中,我们将 600 例急性心肌梗死后合并心源性休克的患者随机分为主动脉内球囊反搏组(IABP 组,301 例)和无主动脉内球囊反搏组(对照组,299 例)。所有患者均预计接受早期血运重建(经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或旁路手术)和最佳的现有药物治疗。主要疗效终点为 30 天全因死亡率。安全性评估包括大出血、外周缺血性并发症、脓毒症和中风。

结果

IABP 组共有 300 例患者和对照组 298 例患者纳入主要终点分析。30 天时,IABP 组 119 例(39.7%)和对照组 123 例(41.3%)患者死亡(IABP 组相对风险,0.96;95%置信区间,0.79 至 1.17;P=0.69)。次要终点或治疗过程措施无显著差异,包括血流动力学稳定时间、重症监护病房住院时间、血清乳酸水平、儿茶酚胺治疗剂量和时间、肾功能。IABP 组和对照组大出血发生率分别为 3.3%和 4.4%(P=0.51)、外周缺血性并发症发生率分别为 4.3%和 3.4%(P=0.53)、脓毒症发生率分别为 15.7%和 20.5%(P=0.15)、中风发生率分别为 0.7%和 1.7%(P=0.28)。

结论

对于计划早期血运重建的急性心肌梗死后合并心源性休克患者,使用主动脉内球囊反搏并未显著降低 30 天死亡率。(由德国研究基金会等资助;IABP-SHOCK II ClinicalTrials.gov 编号,NCT00491036。)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验