Carbone Peter N, Capra Gregory G, Brigger Matthew T
Naval Medical Center San Diego, Department of Anatomic Pathology, San Diego, CA 92134, United States.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Nov;76(11):1647-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.07.038. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
To evaluate the current evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of medical management for deep neck abscesses in children.
Pubmed and Embase databases accessed 3/27/2012.
An a priori protocol defining inclusion and exclusion criteria was developed to identify all articles addressing medical therapy of pediatric deep neck abscesses where details regarding diagnostic criteria, specifics of medical therapy and definitions of failure were presented. The search included electronic databases to identify candidate articles as well as a manual crosscheck of references. The level of evidence was assessed and data extracted by three authors independently. Data were pooled using a random effects model due to significant study heterogeneity.
Eight articles met inclusion criteria. The overall level of evidence was grade C. There was significant heterogeneity among the studies (I(2)=98.8%; p<.001). However, each article uniformly presented cases suggesting that medical therapy may be a viable alternative to surgical drainage in some patients. The pooled success rate of medical therapy in avoiding surgical drainage in children with deep neck infections was 0.517 (95%CI: 0.335, 0.700). When patients taken immediately to surgery were excluded and patients were placed on author defined medical protocols, the success rate increased to 0.951 (95%CI: 0.851, 1.051). Subgroup analysis by duration of intravenous antibiotic trial greater than 48h demonstrated a pooled success rate of 0.740 (95%CI: 0.527, 0.953).
The current literature suggests medical management may be a safe alternative to surgical drainage of deep neck abscesses in children. However, the level of evidence lacks strength and further investigation is warranted.
评估目前关于儿童深部颈部脓肿药物治疗安全性和有效性的证据。
于2012年3月27日检索了PubMed和Embase数据库。
制定了一个先验方案来定义纳入和排除标准,以识别所有涉及儿童深部颈部脓肿药物治疗的文章,这些文章需呈现诊断标准、药物治疗细节及失败定义。检索包括电子数据库以识别候选文章,并对手参考文献进行人工交叉核对。由三位作者独立评估证据水平并提取数据。由于研究存在显著异质性,采用随机效应模型汇总数据。
八篇文章符合纳入标准。总体证据水平为C级。研究间存在显著异质性(I(2)=98.8%;p<0.001)。然而,每篇文章均一致呈现了一些病例,提示在某些患者中药物治疗可能是手术引流的可行替代方案。儿童深部颈部感染药物治疗避免手术引流的汇总成功率为0.517(95%置信区间:0.335,0.700)。排除立即接受手术的患者并将患者置于作者定义的药物治疗方案后,成功率增至0.951(95%置信区间:0.851,1.051)。静脉抗生素试验持续时间大于48小时的亚组分析显示汇总成功率为0.740(95%置信区间:0.527,0.953)。
当前文献表明,药物治疗可能是儿童深部颈部脓肿手术引流的安全替代方案。然而,证据水平缺乏力度,有必要进一步研究。