Suppr超能文献

一项关于利用酿酒酵母厌氧发酵生产的酵母培养物对泌乳奶牛产奶性能影响的荟萃分析。

A meta-analysis of the effects of feeding yeast culture produced by anaerobic fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on milk production of lactating dairy cows.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2012 Oct;95(10):6027-41. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5577. Epub 2012 Aug 23.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to use meta-analytic methods to estimate the effect of a commercially available yeast culture product on milk production and other production measures in lactating dairy cows using a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sixty-one research publications (published journal articles, published abstracts, and technical reports) were identified through a review of literature provided by the manufacturer and a search of published literature using 6 search engines. Thirty-six separate studies with 69 comparisons met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The fixed-effect meta-analysis showed substantial heterogeneity for milk yield, energy-corrected milk, 3.5% fat-corrected milk, milk fat yield, and milk protein yield. Sub-group analysis of the data showed much less heterogeneity in peer-reviewed studies versus non-peer-reviewed abstracts and technical reports, and tended to show higher, but not significantly different, treatment effects. A random-effects meta-analysis showed estimated raw mean differences between treated and untreated cattle reported in peer-reviewed publications of 1.18 kg/d [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55 to 1.81], 1.61 kg/d (95% CI: 0.92 to 2.29), and 1.65 kg/d (95% CI: 0.97 to 2.34) for milk yield, 3.5% fat-corrected milk, and energy-corrected milk, respectively. Milk fat yield and milk protein yield for peer-reviewed studies showed an increase in the raw mean difference of 0.06 kg/d (95% CI: 0.01 to 0.10) and 0.03 kg/d (95% CI: 0.00 to 0.05), respectively. Estimated raw mean dry matter intake of the peer-reviewed studies during early lactation (<70 d in milk) and not-early lactation were 0.62 kg/d (95% CI: 0.21 to 1.02) and a decrease of 0.78 kg/d (95% CI: -1.36 to -0.21), respectively. These findings provide strong evidence that this commercially available yeast culture product provides significant improvement in several important milk production outcomes as evaluated in production settings typical for commercial dairies in North America. Utilizing meta-analytic methods to study the complete breadth of information relating to a specific treatment by studying multiple overcomes of all eligible studies can reduce the uncertainty often seen in small individual studies designed without sufficient power to detect differences in treatments.

摘要

本研究旨在采用荟萃分析方法,通过对已发表文献的综述和使用 6 个搜索引擎对已发表文献的检索,利用随机对照试验对市售酵母培养物产品对泌乳奶牛产奶量和其他生产指标的影响进行评估。通过制造商提供的文献回顾和使用 6 个搜索引擎对已发表文献的检索,共确定了 61 篇研究出版物(已发表的期刊文章、已发表的摘要和技术报告)。36 项独立研究,69 项对照,符合荟萃分析的纳入标准。固定效应荟萃分析显示,产奶量、能量校正奶、3.5%脂肪校正奶、乳脂产量和乳蛋白产量存在显著的异质性。数据的亚组分析表明,同行评议研究与非同行评议摘要和技术报告之间的异质性要小得多,且治疗效果往往更高,但无统计学差异。随机效应荟萃分析显示,在同行评议出版物中,治疗牛与未治疗牛之间的原始平均差异估计值分别为 1.18kg/d(95%置信区间:0.55 至 1.81)、1.61kg/d(95%置信区间:0.92 至 2.29)和 1.65kg/d(95%置信区间:0.97 至 2.34),分别用于产奶量、3.5%脂肪校正奶和能量校正奶。同行评议研究的乳脂产量和乳蛋白产量的原始平均差异分别增加了 0.06kg/d(95%置信区间:0.01 至 0.10)和 0.03kg/d(95%置信区间:0.00 至 0.05)。在早期泌乳期(<70 天泌乳期)和非早期泌乳期,同行评议研究的估计原始干物质摄入量分别为 0.62kg/d(95%置信区间:0.21 至 1.02)和减少 0.78kg/d(95%置信区间:-1.36 至-0.21)。这些发现为市售酵母培养物产品在北美商业奶牛场典型生产环境中对多项重要产奶量结果的显著改善提供了有力证据。利用荟萃分析方法研究与特定治疗相关的完整信息范围,通过研究多个克服所有合格研究的方法,可以减少在设计时没有足够的检测治疗差异的能力的小型单独研究中常见的不确定性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验