Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
J Pediatr. 2013 Feb;162(2):392-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.07.018. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
To determine the optimal imaging strategy for young children with minor head injury considering health-related quality of life and radiation risk. In children with minor head trauma, the risk of missing a clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI) must be weighed against the risk of radiation-induced malignancy from computed tomography (CT) to assess impact on public health.
We included children <2 years old with minor blunt head trauma defined by a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 14-15. We used decision analysis to model a CT-all versus no-CT strategy and assigned values to clinical outcomes based on a validated health-related quality of life scale: (1) baseline health; (2) non-ciTBI; (3) ciTBI without neurosurgery, death, or intubation; and (4) ciTBI with neurosurgery, death, or intubation >24 hours with probabilities from a prospective study of 10000 children. Sensitivity analysis determined the optimal management strategy over a range of ciTBI risk.
The no-CT strategy resulted in less risk with the expected probability of a ciTBI of 0.9%. Sensitivity analysis for the probability of ciTBI identified 4.8% as the threshold above which CT all becomes the preferred strategy and shows that the threshold decreases with less radiation. The CT all strategy represents the preferred approach for children identified as high-risk.
Among children <2 years old with minor head trauma, the no-CT strategy is preferable for those at low risk, reserving CT for children at higher risk.
考虑到健康相关生活质量和辐射风险,确定对轻度头部外伤的幼儿进行最佳影像学检查策略。在患有轻度头部创伤的儿童中,必须权衡错过临床重要性创伤性脑损伤(ciTBI)的风险与计算机断层扫描(CT)引起的辐射诱发恶性肿瘤的风险,以评估对公共健康的影响。
我们纳入了格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为 14-15 的年龄<2 岁的轻度钝性头部外伤儿童。我们使用决策分析来构建 CT 全扫与非 CT 策略,并根据经过验证的健康相关生活质量量表为临床结果赋值:(1)基线健康;(2)无 ciTBI;(3)无手术、死亡或插管的 ciTBI;以及(4)有手术、死亡或插管>24 小时的 ciTBI,概率来自对 10000 名儿童的前瞻性研究。敏感性分析确定了在一定范围的 ciTBI 风险下的最佳管理策略。
非 CT 策略的风险较小,ciTBI 的预期概率为 0.9%。ciTBI 概率的敏感性分析确定了 4.8%作为 CT 全扫成为首选策略的阈值,并表明该阈值随辐射减少而降低。对于被认为是高风险的儿童,CT 全扫策略代表了首选方法。
在年龄<2 岁的轻度头部外伤儿童中,对于低风险儿童,非 CT 策略更为可取,将 CT 保留用于高风险儿童。