Suppr超能文献

各专业医生的终身收入。

Lifetime earnings for physicians across specialties.

机构信息

Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Davis, CA 95616-8638, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2012 Dec;50(12):1093-101. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318268ac0c.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Earlier studies estimated annual income differences across specialties, but lifetime income may be more relevant given physicians' long-term commitments to specialties.

METHODS

Annual income and work hours data were collected from 6381 physicians in the nationally representative 2004-2005 Community Tracking Study. Data regarding years of residency were collected from AMA FREIDA. Present value models were constructed assuming 3% discount rates. Estimates were adjusted for demographic and market covariates. Sensitivity analyses included 4 alternative models involving work hours, retirement, exogenous variables, and 1% discount rate. Estimates were generated for 4 broad specialty categories (Primary Care, Surgery, Internal Medicine and Pediatric Subspecialties, and Other), and for 41 specific specialties.

RESULTS

The estimates of lifetime earnings for the broad categories of Surgery, Internal Medicine and Pediatric Subspecialties, and Other specialties were $1,587,722, $1,099,655, and $761,402 more than for Primary Care. For the 41 specific specialties, the top 3 (with family medicine as reference) were neurological surgery ($2,880,601), medical oncology ($2,772,665), and radiation oncology ($2,659,657). The estimates from models with varying rates of retirement and including only exogenous variables were similar to those in the preferred model. The 1% discount model generated estimates that were roughly 150% larger than the 3% model.

CONCLUSIONS

There was considerable variation in the lifetime earnings across physician specialties. After accounting for varying residency years and discounting future earnings, primary care specialties earned roughly $1-3 million less than other specialties. Earnings' differences across specialties may undermine health reform efforts to control costs and ensure adequate numbers of primary care physicians.

摘要

背景

早期的研究估计了各专业之间的年收入差异,但考虑到医生对专业的长期投入,终身收入可能更为相关。

方法

从全国代表性的 2004-2005 年社区跟踪研究中收集了 6381 名医生的年收入和工作时间数据。从 AMA FREIDA 收集了关于住院年限的数据。使用 3%的折扣率构建了现值模型。对人口统计学和市场协变量进行了调整。敏感性分析包括 4 种替代模型,涉及工作时间、退休、外生变量和 1%的折扣率。为 4 个广泛的专业类别(初级保健、外科、内科和儿科亚专业以及其他)和 41 个特定专业生成了估计值。

结果

外科、内科和儿科亚专业以及其他专业的大类估计终身收入比初级保健多 1587722 美元、1099655 美元和 761402 美元。对于 41 个特定专业,前 3 名(以家庭医学为参照)分别为神经外科(2880601 美元)、肿瘤内科(2772665 美元)和放射肿瘤学(2659657 美元)。具有不同退休率的模型和仅包含外生变量的模型的估计值与首选模型相似。1%的折扣模型产生的估计值比 3%的模型大约高出 150%。

结论

医生专业之间的终身收入存在相当大的差异。在考虑到不同的住院年限和贴现未来收入后,初级保健专业的收入比其他专业低约 100 万至 300 万美元。专业之间的收入差异可能会破坏医疗改革控制成本和确保有足够数量的初级保健医生的努力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验