Suppr超能文献

妨碍创伤中心救治的机构和提供者因素:区域性创伤系统中转诊实践的分析。

Institutional and provider factors impeding access to trauma center care: an analysis of transfer practices in a regional trauma system.

机构信息

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Nov;73(5):1288-93. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318265cec2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

More than a third of patients with severe injury who receive initial care at nontrauma centers (NTCs) are not transferred to trauma center care. In those who are transferred, significant delays have been described. The availability of specialists, imaging modalities, or critical care resources might significantly affect transfer practices.

METHODS

We undertook a population-based retrospective cohort study of adult patients with severe injury who were transported from the scene to an NTC. NTCs were characterized based on the availability of general and orthopedic surgeons, computed tomographic scanners, intensive care units, and emergency department staffing. NTCs that had all of the resources were characterized as resource rich, while those with none were characterized as resource limited. We evaluated the relationships between NTC resources and the likelihood and timeliness of interfacility transfer through the use of hierarchical regression modeling.

RESULTS

We identified 15,906 patients with severe injury across 192 NTCs (22% were resource limited, 57% were resource intermediate, and 21% were resource rich). Patients at resource rich centers, as compared with those at resource limited centers, were less likely to be transferred (27% vs. 50%, p < 0.001). This association persisted after adjustment for confounders (odds ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.92). Among patients who were transferred, median emergency department length of stay (ED-LOS) was 3.5 hours (interquartile range, 1.7-4.6 hours). However, ED-LOS varied significantly because resource rich centers had a greater proportion of patients experiencing prolonged ED-LOS when compared with resource limited centers (31% vs. 15%, p < 0.001). This association also persisted on multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 2.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-3.43).

CONCLUSION

Severely injured patients who received initial care in resource rich NTCs were less likely to be transferred to a trauma center compared with resource limited NTCs. Significant delays in the transfer process were identified. However, patients transferred from resource rich centers were more likely to experience prolonged ED-LOS compared with resource limited NTCs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Epidemiologic study, level II.

摘要

背景

超过三分之一在非创伤中心(NTC)接受初始治疗的严重创伤患者未转至创伤中心治疗。在那些转院的患者中,已经描述了明显的延迟。专家、成像方式或重症监护资源的可用性可能会极大地影响转院实践。

方法

我们对从现场转运至 NTC 的成年严重创伤患者进行了一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。根据普通外科医生和骨科医生、计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描仪、重症监护病房和急诊部门人员配备情况对 NTC 进行了特征描述。具备所有资源的 NTC 被定义为资源丰富,而无任何资源的 NTC 被定义为资源有限。我们通过使用分层回归模型评估了 NTC 资源与院内转院的可能性和及时性之间的关系。

结果

我们在 192 个 NTC 中确定了 15906 名严重创伤患者(22%的 NTC 资源有限,57%的 NTC 资源中等,21%的 NTC 资源丰富)。与资源有限中心的患者相比,资源丰富中心的患者转院的可能性较小(27% vs. 50%,p < 0.001)。调整混杂因素后,这种关联仍然存在(比值比,0.66;95%置信区间,0.47-0.92)。在转院的患者中,急诊室(ED)留观时间中位数为 3.5 小时(四分位距,1.7-4.6 小时)。然而,ED 留观时间差异显著,因为与资源有限中心相比,资源丰富中心经历较长 ED 留观时间的患者比例更大(31% vs. 15%,p < 0.001)。多变量分析也显示了这种关联(比值比,2.02;95%置信区间,1.19-3.43)。

结论

与资源有限的 NTC 相比,在资源丰富的 NTC 接受初始治疗的严重创伤患者转至创伤中心的可能性较小。在转院过程中发现了明显的延迟。然而,与资源有限的 NTC 相比,从资源丰富的中心转院的患者更有可能经历较长的 ED 留观时间。

证据水平

流行病学研究,Ⅱ级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验