Janik M, Łoskiewicz J, Tokonami S, Kozak K, Mazur J, Ishikawa T
National Institute of Radiological Sciences, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage, Chiba 263-8555, Japan.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012 Nov;152(1-3):168-73. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncs217. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
Radon measurements, as do any measurements, include errors in their readings. The relative values of such errors depend principally on the measurement methods used, the radon concentration to be measured and the duration of the measurements. Typical exposure times for radon surveys using passive detectors [nuclear track detectors, activated charcoal, electrostatic (E-perm), etc.)] may extend from a few days to months, whereas, in the case of screening methods utilising active radon monitors (AlphaGUARD, RAD7, EQF, etc.), the measurements may be completed quickly within a few hours to a few days. Thus, the latter may have relatively large error values, which affect the measurement accuracy significantly compared with the former measurements made over long time periods. The method presented in this paper examines the uncertainty of a short-term radon measurement as an estimate of the long-term mean and suggests a minimum measurement time to achieve a given margin of uncertainty of that estimate.
与任何测量一样,氡测量的读数也存在误差。这些误差的相对值主要取决于所使用的测量方法、待测的氡浓度以及测量持续时间。使用被动探测器(核径迹探测器、活性炭、静电探测器等)进行氡调查的典型暴露时间可能从几天到几个月不等,而对于使用主动式氡监测仪(AlphaGUARD、RAD7、EQF等)的筛查方法,测量可在几小时到几天内迅速完成。因此,后者可能具有相对较大的误差值,与长时间进行的前者测量相比,这会显著影响测量精度。本文提出的方法研究了短期氡测量作为长期平均值估计的不确定性,并提出了达到该估计给定不确定度范围所需的最短测量时间。