Wang J, Liu J, Zhu L, Qi J Y, Chen Y H, Xiao T F, Fu S M, Wang C L, Li J W
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012 Nov;152(1-3):215-9. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncs229. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
The paper focused on the leaching behaviour of uranium (U) and thorium (Th) from uranium mill tailing collected from the Uranium Mill Plant in Northern Guangdong Province, China. Distilled water (pH 6) and sulphuric acid solution (pH 4 and 3) were used as solvent for the leaching over 22 weeks. It was found that the cumulative leach fraction from the mill tailing was 0.1, 0.1 and 0.7 % for U release, and overall 0.01 % for Th release, using distilled water, sulphuric acid solution of pH 4 and pH 3 as leaching agents, respectively. The results indicate that (1) the release of U and Th in uranium mill tailing is a slow and long-term process; (2) surface dissolution is the main mechanism for the release of U and Th when sulphuric acid solution of pH 3 is employed as the leaching agent; (3) both U and Th are released by diffusion when using sulphuric acid solution of pH 4 as the leaching agent and (4) U is released by surface dissolution, while Th is released by diffusion when using distilled water as the leaching agent. The implication for radiological risk in the real environment was also discussed.
该论文聚焦于从中国广东省北部铀矿厂采集的铀矿尾矿中铀(U)和钍(Th)的浸出行为。使用蒸馏水(pH 6)和硫酸溶液(pH 4和3)作为溶剂进行了为期22周的浸出实验。结果发现,分别使用蒸馏水、pH 4的硫酸溶液和pH 3的硫酸溶液作为浸出剂时,尾矿中铀的累积浸出率分别为0.1%、0.1%和0.7%,钍的总体浸出率为0.01%。结果表明:(1)铀矿尾矿中铀和钍的释放是一个缓慢且长期的过程;(2)当使用pH 3的硫酸溶液作为浸出剂时,表面溶解是铀和钍释放的主要机制;(3)当使用pH 4的硫酸溶液作为浸出剂时,铀和钍均通过扩散释放;(4)当使用蒸馏水作为浸出剂时,铀通过表面溶解释放,而钍通过扩散释放。文中还讨论了实际环境中放射性风险的影响。