• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正常外周带表观扩散系数的患者间变异:对前列腺癌侵袭性预测的影响。

Interpatient variation in normal peripheral zone apparent diffusion coefficient: effect on the prediction of prostate cancer aggressiveness.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Radiology. 2012 Oct;265(1):260-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112374. Epub 2012 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1148/radiol.12112374
PMID:22923722
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the interpatient variability of prostate peripheral zone (PZ) apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and its effect on the assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The requirement for institutional review board approval was waived. Intra- and interpatient variation of PZ ADCs was determined by means of repeated measurements of normal ADCs at three magnetic resonance (MR) examinations in a retrospective cohort of 10 consecutive patients who had high prostate-specific antigen levels and negative findings at transrectal ultrasonographically-guided biopsy. In these patients, no signs of PZ cancer were found at all three MR imaging sessions. The effect of interpatient variation on the assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness was examined in a second retrospective cohort of 51 patients with PZ prostate cancer. Whole-mount step-section pathologic evaluation served as reference standard for placement of regions of interest on tumors and normal PZ. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to determine the significance of the interpatient variations in ADCs. Linear logistic regression was used to assess whether incorporating normal PZ ADCs improves the prediction of cancer aggressiveness.

RESULTS

Analysis of variance revealed that interpatient variability (1.2-2.0×10(-3) mm2/sec) was significantly larger than measurement variability (0.068×10(-3) mm2/sec±0.027 [standard deviation]) (P=.0058). Stand-alone tumor ADCs showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.91 for discriminating low-grade versus high-grade tumors. Incorporating normal PZ ADC significantly improved the AUC to 0.96 (P=.0401).

CONCLUSION

PZ ADCs show significant interpatient variation, which has a substantial effect on the prediction of prostate cancer aggressiveness. Correcting this effect results in a significant increase in diagnostic accuracy.

摘要

目的

确定前列腺外周带(PZ)表观扩散系数(ADC)的患者间变异性及其对评估前列腺癌侵袭性的影响。

材料与方法

本研究获得机构审查委员会豁免批准。回顾性分析 10 例连续患者的资料,这些患者前列腺特异性抗原水平升高,经直肠超声引导下活检未见异常,在 3 次磁共振(MR)检查中重复测量正常 ADC,以确定 PZ ADC 的患者内和患者间变异性。在所有 3 次 MR 成像检查中,这些患者的 PZ 均未见癌征象。在另一组 51 例 PZ 前列腺癌患者中,研究患者间变异性对评估前列腺癌侵袭性的影响。全器官切片病理检查作为在肿瘤和正常 PZ 上放置感兴趣区的参考标准。采用重复测量方差分析确定 ADC 患者间变异性的显著性。采用线性逻辑回归分析评估纳入正常 PZ ADC 是否能改善对癌症侵袭性的预测。

结果

方差分析显示,患者间变异性(1.2-2.0×10(-3)mm2/sec)明显大于测量变异性(0.068×10(-3)mm2/sec±0.027[标准差])(P=.0058)。孤立肿瘤 ADC 用于区分低级别和高级别肿瘤的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.91。纳入正常 PZ ADC 可显著提高 AUC 至 0.96(P=.0401)。

结论

PZ ADC 存在明显的患者间变异性,对预测前列腺癌侵袭性有很大影响。校正这种影响可显著提高诊断准确性。

相似文献

1
Interpatient variation in normal peripheral zone apparent diffusion coefficient: effect on the prediction of prostate cancer aggressiveness.正常外周带表观扩散系数的患者间变异:对前列腺癌侵袭性预测的影响。
Radiology. 2012 Oct;265(1):260-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112374. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
2
Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer.3.0T MRI 下表观扩散系数与前列腺癌外周带 Gleason 分级的关系。
Radiology. 2011 May;259(2):453-61. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11091409.
3
Prostate cancer: feasibility and preliminary experience of a diffusional kurtosis model for detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer.前列腺癌:扩散峰度模型检测和评估外周区癌侵袭性的可行性及初步经验。
Radiology. 2012 Jul;264(1):126-35. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112290. Epub 2012 May 1.
4
Prostate cancer: identification with combined diffusion-weighted MR imaging and 3D 1H MR spectroscopic imaging--correlation with pathologic findings.前列腺癌:联合扩散加权磁共振成像与三维氢质子磁共振波谱成像的鉴别——与病理结果的相关性
Radiology. 2008 Feb;246(2):480-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2462070368.
5
Differentiation of prostatitis and prostate cancer by using diffusion-weighted MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy at 3 T.在 3T 磁共振成像和磁共振引导活检中通过扩散加权成像对前列腺炎和前列腺癌进行鉴别诊断。
Radiology. 2013 Apr;267(1):164-72. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12111683. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
6
Intermixed normal tissue within prostate cancer: effect on MR imaging measurements of apparent diffusion coefficient and T2--sparse versus dense cancers.前列腺癌内的混杂正常组织:对表观扩散系数和T2加权成像测量的影响——稀疏癌与致密癌的比较
Radiology. 2008 Dec;249(3):900-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2493080236.
7
Prostate cancer: relationships between postbiopsy hemorrhage and tumor detectability at MR diagnosis.前列腺癌:活检后出血与磁共振成像诊断时肿瘤可检测性之间的关系
Radiology. 2008 Aug;248(2):531-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2482070157. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
8
Detection of prostate cancer with magnetic resonance imaging: optimization of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, dynamic-enhanced T1-weighted, diffusion-weighted imaging apparent diffusion coefficient mapping sequences and MR spectroscopy, correlated with biopsy and histopathological findings.磁共振成像检测前列腺癌:T1加权、T2加权、动态增强T1加权、扩散加权成像表观扩散系数图序列及磁共振波谱的优化,与活检及组织病理学结果相关
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012 Jan-Feb;36(1):30-45. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31823f6263.
9
Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer.前列腺癌的扩散张量磁共振成像
Invest Radiol. 2007 Jun;42(6):412-9. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000264059.46444.bf.
10
Do apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values obtained using high b-values with a 3-T MRI correlate better than a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy with true Gleason scores obtained from radical prostatectomy specimens for patients with prostate cancer?使用 3T MRI 获得的高 b 值表观扩散系数 (ADC) 值与经直肠超声 (TRUS) 引导下前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除标本获得的真正 Gleason 评分相比,是否与患者的前列腺癌相关性更好?
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Aug;82(8):1219-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.02.021. Epub 2013 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Ratio as Prognostic Factors for Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness.表观扩散系数值及表观扩散系数比率作为前列腺癌侵袭性预后因素的作用
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 31;14(21):2438. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14212438.
2
Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: A review of current technology.前列腺癌的定量磁共振成像:当前技术综述
World J Radiol. 2024 Oct 28;16(10):497-511. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v16.i10.497.
3
The QIBA Profile for Diffusion-Weighted MRI: Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker.
QIBA 弥散加权 MRI 特征:表观弥散系数作为一种定量成像生物标志物。
Radiology. 2024 Oct;313(1):e233055. doi: 10.1148/radiol.233055.
4
Diagnostic performance of ADC and ADCratio in MRI-based prostate cancer assessment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.基于MRI的前列腺癌评估中ADC及ADC比率的诊断性能:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jan;35(1):404-416. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10890-6. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
5
Nomogram Models for Distinguishing Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate From Prostatic Acinar Adenocarcinoma Based on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.基于多参数磁共振成像的前列腺导管内癌与前列腺腺癌鉴别列线图模型。
Korean J Radiol. 2023 Jul;24(7):668-680. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2022.1022.
6
Radiogenomics Reveals Correlation between Quantitative Texture Radiomic Features of Biparametric MRI and Hypoxia-Related Gene Expression in Men with Localised Prostate Cancer.放射基因组学揭示了双参数磁共振成像的定量纹理放射组学特征与局限性前列腺癌男性患者缺氧相关基因表达之间的相关性。
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 30;12(7):2605. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072605.
7
Test-retest repeatability of ADC in prostate using the multi b-Value VERDICT acquisition.采用多 b 值 VERDICT 采集法测量前列腺 ADC 的重测重复性。
Eur J Radiol. 2023 May;162:110782. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110782. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
8
Machine learning-based radiomics model to predict benign and malignant PI-RADS v2.1 category 3 lesions: a retrospective multi-center study.基于机器学习的放射组学模型预测 PI-RADS v2.1 分类 3 级良恶性病变:一项回顾性多中心研究。
BMC Med Imaging. 2023 Mar 29;23(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12880-023-01002-9.
9
Correlation between ADC, ADC ratio, and Gleason Grade group in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: Retrospective multicenter study with different MRI scanners.接受根治性前列腺切除术的前列腺癌患者中表观扩散系数(ADC)、ADC比值与Gleason分级组之间的相关性:使用不同MRI扫描仪的回顾性多中心研究
Front Oncol. 2023 Feb 20;13:1079040. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1079040. eCollection 2023.
10
A Prognostic Model Generated from an Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Ratio Reliably Predicts the Outcomes of Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma.基于表观弥散系数比构建的预后模型可准确预测口腔舌鳞癌的预后。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Nov 22;29(12):9031-9045. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29120708.