Melbourne Dental School, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Aust Dent J. 2012 Sep;57(3):319-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2012.01704.x. Epub 2012 Jun 24.
This study aimed to evaluate the association between the fracture toughness of two nanofilled-hybrid resin composites (Clearfil Majesty Esthetic [CME], Kuraray Medical, Japan; Estelite Σ [ES], Tokuyama, Japan) and their bond strengths to enamel and dentine mediated by a self-etching primer system (Clearfil SE Bond [CSE]; Kuraray).
Twenty-four permanent human molars were sectioned into enamel and dentine specimens and finished with 600-grit silicon carbide paper, bonded with CSE and either CME or ES, for μ-shear bond strength (μSBS) and μ-tensile bond strength (μTBS). The specimens were tested until failure at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min, failure loads recorded, bond strengths calculated and results analysed using independent samples t-tests. Eight single-notched bar-shaped specimens, 30 mm × 5.2 mm × 2.2 mm, were prepared for each resin composite and fracture toughness measured using four-point bending at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min. Results were analysed using independent samples t-tests.
For μSBS and μTBS, there was no significant difference between the resin composites for enamel or dentine. The fracture toughness of CME was significantly higher than that of ES.
For both enamel and dentine, resin composite fracture toughness affected neither μTBS nor μSBS to enamel or dentine.
本研究旨在评估两种纳米复合树脂(Clearfil Majesty Esthetic [CME],日本 Kuraray Medical;Estelite Σ [ES],日本 Tokuyama)的断裂韧性与其通过自酸蚀底漆系统(Clearfil SE Bond [CSE];Kuraray)与牙釉质和牙本质结合的强度之间的关系。
将 24 个人类恒磨牙分为釉质和牙本质标本,用 600 目碳化硅砂纸进行打磨,用 CSE 分别与 CME 或 ES 粘结,进行微剪切粘结强度(μSBS)和微拉伸粘结强度(μTBS)测试。在十字头速度为 1mm/min 的情况下,将标本测试至失效,记录失效荷载,计算粘结强度,并使用独立样本 t 检验对结果进行分析。为每种树脂复合材料制备 8 个单缺口棒状试件,尺寸为 30mm×5.2mm×2.2mm,在十字头速度为 0.5mm/min 的情况下进行四点弯曲试验,测量断裂韧性。使用独立样本 t 检验对结果进行分析。
对于 μSBS 和 μTBS,两种树脂复合材料在釉质和牙本质上均无显著差异。CME 的断裂韧性显著高于 ES。
对于釉质和牙本质,树脂复合材料的断裂韧性既不影响 μTBS,也不影响 μSBS 与釉质或牙本质的结合。