• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索概念宇宙。

Exploring the conceptual universe.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Baker Hall 340T, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Rev. 2012 Oct;119(4):685-722. doi: 10.1037/a0029347. Epub 2012 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1037/a0029347
PMID:22924770
Abstract

Humans can learn to organize many kinds of domains into categories, including real-world domains such as kinsfolk and synthetic domains such as sets of geometric figures that vary along several dimensions. Psychologists have studied many individual domains in detail, but there have been few attempts to characterize or explore the full space of possibilities. This article provides a formal characterization that takes objects, features, and relations as primitives and specifies conceptual domains by combining these primitives in different ways. Explaining how humans are able to learn concepts within all of these domains is a challenge for computational models, but I argue that this challenge can be met by models that rely on a compositional representation language such as predicate logic. The article presents such a model and demonstrates that it accounts well for human concept learning across 11 different domains.

摘要

人类可以学习将许多种类的领域组织成类别,包括真实世界的领域,如亲属关系,以及合成领域,如具有多个维度的几何图形的集合。心理学家已经详细研究了许多个别的领域,但很少有尝试来描述或探索全部可能的空间。本文提供了一个正式的特征描述,将对象、特征和关系作为基本元素,并通过以不同的方式组合这些基本元素来指定概念领域。解释人类如何能够在所有这些领域中学习概念是计算模型面临的一个挑战,但我认为,这种挑战可以通过依赖于组合表示语言(如谓词逻辑)的模型来应对。本文提出了这样一种模型,并证明它可以很好地解释人类在 11 个不同领域中的概念学习。

相似文献

1
Exploring the conceptual universe.探索概念宇宙。
Psychol Rev. 2012 Oct;119(4):685-722. doi: 10.1037/a0029347. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
2
The logical primitives of thought: Empirical foundations for compositional cognitive models.思维的逻辑原语:组合认知模型的经验基础。
Psychol Rev. 2016 Jul;123(4):392-424. doi: 10.1037/a0039980. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
3
Attentional learning and flexible induction: how mundane mechanisms give rise to smart behaviors.注意力学习与灵活归纳:平凡机制如何产生智能行为。
Child Dev. 2008 May-Jun;79(3):639-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01148.x.
4
A causal-model theory of conceptual representation and categorization.概念表征与分类的因果模型理论。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Nov;29(6):1141-59. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1141.
5
The effects of relational structure on analogical learning.关系结构对类比学习的影响。
Cognition. 2014 Sep;132(3):280-300. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 May 21.
6
On the necessity of U-shaped learning.论 U 型学习的必要性。
Top Cogn Sci. 2013 Jan;5(1):56-88. doi: 10.1111/tops.12002.
7
Instantiated features and the use of "rules.".实例化特征与“规则”的使用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 May;135(2):133-51. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.133.
8
Concepts and their dynamics: a quantum-theoretic modeling of human thought.概念及其动态:人类思维的量子理论建模。
Top Cogn Sci. 2013 Oct;5(4):737-72. doi: 10.1111/tops.12042. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
9
Bootstrapping in a language of thought: a formal model of numerical concept learning.思维语言中的自举:数值概念学习的形式模型。
Cognition. 2012 May;123(2):199-217. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.005. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
10
Similar to the category, but not the exemplars: A study of generalization.类似于范畴,但非范例:一项关于泛化的研究。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1312-1323. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1208-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Logical word learning: The case of kinship.逻辑词学习:以亲属关系为例。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Jun;29(3):766-799. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-02017-5. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
2
REFRESH: A new approach to modeling dimensional biases in perceptual similarity and categorization.REFRESH:一种新的方法,用于对感知相似性和分类中的维度偏差进行建模。
Psychol Rev. 2021 Nov;128(6):1145-1186. doi: 10.1037/rev0000310. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
3
Learning and Representation of Hierarchical Concepts in Hippocampus and Prefrontal Cortex.海马体和前额叶皮层中层次概念的学习和表示。
J Neurosci. 2021 Sep 8;41(36):7675-7686. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0657-21.2021. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
4
The computational origin of representation.表征的计算起源。
Minds Mach (Dordr). 2021 Mar;31:1-58. doi: 10.1007/s11023-020-09540-9. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
5
A logical framework to study concept-learning biases in the presence of multiple explanations.一种在存在多种解释的情况下研究概念学习偏差的逻辑框架。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Feb;54(1):233-251. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01596-4. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
6
Benefits and pitfalls of data compression in visual working memory.视觉工作记忆中数据压缩的优缺点。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Oct;83(7):2843-2864. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02333-x. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
7
The Hippocampus Maps Concept Space, Not Feature Space.海马体绘制概念空间,而非特征空间。
J Neurosci. 2020 Sep 16;40(38):7318-7325. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0494-20.2020. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
8
Classification errors and response times over multiple distributed sessions as a function of category structure.作为类别结构函数的多个分布式会话中的分类错误和响应时间。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Oct;46(7):1041-1057. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0820-x.
9
Optimal behavioral hierarchy.最佳行为层次结构。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Aug 14;10(8):e1003779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003779. eCollection 2014 Aug.
10
A taxonomy of inductive problems.归纳问题分类法。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Feb;21(1):23-46. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0467-3.