Suppr超能文献

使用正念认知疗法、抗抑郁药物或两者联合预防复发性抑郁症复发:MOMENT 研究的试验设计和方案。

Preventing relapse in recurrent depression using mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, antidepressant medication or the combination: trial design and protocol of the MOMENT study.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Reinier Postlaan 10, Nijmegen 6525 GC, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2012 Aug 27;12:125. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-125.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Depression is a common psychiatric disorder characterized by a high rate of relapse and recurrence. The most commonly used strategy to prevent relapse/recurrence is maintenance treatment with antidepressant medication (mADM). Recently, it has been shown that Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) is at least as effective as mADM in reducing the relapse/recurrence risk. However, it is not yet known whether combination treatment of MBCT and mADM is more effective than either of these treatments alone. Given the fact that most patients have a preference for either mADM or for MBCT, the aim of the present study is to answer the following questions. First, what is the effectiveness of MBCT in addition to mADM? Second, how large is the risk of relapse/recurrence in patients withdrawing from mADM after participating in MBCT, compared to those who continue to use mADM after MBCT?

METHODS/DESIGN: Two parallel-group, multi-center randomized controlled trials are conducted. Adult patients with a history of depression (3 or more episodes), currently either in full or partial remission and currently treated with mADM (6 months or longer) are recruited. In the first trial, we compare mADM on its own with mADM plus MBCT. In the second trial, we compare MBCT on its own, including tapering of mADM, with mADM plus MBCT. Follow-up assessments are administered at 3-month intervals for 15 months. Primary outcome is relapse/recurrence. Secondary outcomes are time to, duration and severity of relapse/recurrence, quality of life, personality, several process variables, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

DISCUSSION

Taking into account patient preferences, this study will provide information about a) the clinical and cost-effectiveness of mADM only compared with mADM plus MBCT, in patients with a preference for mADM, and b) the clinical and cost-effectiveness of withdrawing from mADM after MBCT, compared with mADM plus MBCT, in patients with a preference for MBCT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00928980.

摘要

背景

抑郁症是一种常见的精神障碍,其复发和再发率较高。预防复发/再发最常用的策略是使用抗抑郁药物(mADM)进行维持治疗。最近的研究表明,正念认知疗法(MBCT)在降低复发/再发风险方面至少与 mADM 同样有效。然而,目前尚不清楚 MBCT 联合 mADM 是否比这两种治疗方法中的任何一种单独治疗更有效。鉴于大多数患者对 mADM 或 MBCT 都有偏好,本研究旨在回答以下问题。首先,MBCT 在 mADM 之外的有效性如何?其次,与接受 MBCT 后继续使用 mADM 的患者相比,参加 MBCT 后停止使用 mADM 的患者的复发/再发风险有多大?

方法/设计:进行两项平行组、多中心随机对照试验。招募有抑郁症病史(3 次或以上发作)、目前处于完全或部分缓解期且目前正在接受 mADM(6 个月或更长时间)治疗的成年患者。在第一个试验中,我们比较单独使用 mADM 与 mADM 加 MBCT。在第二个试验中,我们比较单独使用 MBCT,包括逐渐减少 mADM,与 mADM 加 MBCT。在 15 个月内,每隔 3 个月进行一次随访评估。主要结局是复发/再发。次要结局是复发/再发的时间、持续时间和严重程度、生活质量、人格、几个过程变量和增量成本效益比。

讨论

考虑到患者的偏好,本研究将提供以下信息:a)对于偏好 mADM 的患者,mADM 单独使用与 mADM 加 MBCT 相比的临床和成本效益,以及 b)对于偏好 MBCT 的患者,MBCT 后停止使用 mADM 与 mADM 加 MBCT 相比的临床和成本效益。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT00928980。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9c4/3469366/0975d60f0504/1471-244X-12-125-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验