Suppr超能文献

人类实验性骨痛模型。

A human experimental bone pain model.

机构信息

Mech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Aalborg Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2013 Feb;112(2):116-23. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12002. Epub 2012 Oct 20.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a human experimental bone pain model. Fourteen healthy men were included in two study sessions. Pressure pain threshold (PPT) was estimated using probes of different sizes. Computer-controlled and hand-held algometry were applied to the skin area covering right and left medial tibia before and after local anaesthesia (LA) of the skin and reproducibility was evaluated. Pain experience (McGill questionnaire) was compared between healthy volunteers and 12 patients with vertebral fractures. Computer-controlled algometer: No differences in PPT between study sessions for 6 and 8-mm probes (p = 0.43 and 0.32) were seen. There was a difference in PPT before and after LA for the 6-mm probe (p = 0.008), but not for the 8-mm probe (p = 0.26). Hand-held algometer: A difference in PPT between study sessions was observed for 4- and 8-mm probes (p = 0.03 and 0.007), but not for 2, 6 and 10-mm probes (p = 0.19, 0.05 and 0.25). No differences in PPT were seen before and after LA for 2, 4, 8 and 10-mm probes (p = 0.35, 0.15, 0.08 and 0.53), but LA significantly influenced PPT with the 6-mm probe (p = 0.01). Similar words were chosen in the McGill pain questionnaire by healthy volunteers and patients, qualitatively describing the deep pain sensation. The pain evoked by hand-held algometer and the 2-mm probe was not influenced by LA, and PPT was reproducible between sessions and is recommended for studies of experimentally evoked bone-associated pain.

摘要

本研究旨在建立人体实验性骨痛模型。共纳入 14 名健康男性,分为两个研究组。使用不同大小的探头测量压力疼痛阈值(PPT)。在皮肤局部麻醉(LA)前后,采用计算机控制和手动压力计测量右侧和左侧胫骨内侧皮肤区域的 PPT,并评估其重复性。将健康志愿者和 12 例椎体骨折患者的疼痛体验(麦吉尔问卷)进行比较。计算机控制的压力计:6 毫米和 8 毫米探头的研究组之间的 PPT 无差异(p=0.43 和 0.32)。6 毫米探头的 PPT 在 LA 前后有差异(p=0.008),但 8 毫米探头无差异(p=0.26)。手动压力计:4 毫米和 8 毫米探头的研究组之间的 PPT 有差异(p=0.03 和 0.007),但 2、6 和 10 毫米探头无差异(p=0.19、0.05 和 0.25)。LA 前后,2、4、8 和 10 毫米探头的 PPT 无差异(p=0.35、0.15、0.08 和 0.53),但 6 毫米探头的 PPT 有显著影响(p=0.01)。健康志愿者和患者在麦吉尔疼痛问卷中选择了相似的词语,定性描述了深部疼痛感觉。手动压力计和 2 毫米探头引起的疼痛不受 LA 影响,且 PPT 在组间具有可重复性,推荐用于研究实验性骨相关疼痛。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验