Selcuk University Faculty of Dentistry, Oral Radiology Department, 42079, Kampüs Konya Turkey.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 Nov 1;17(6):e1074-81. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17912.
The aims of this study were to explore how image compression affects density, fractal dimension, linear and angular measurements on digital panoramic images and assess inter and intra-observer repeatability of these measurements.
Sixty-one digital panoramic images in TIFF format (Tagged Image File Format) were compressed to JPEG (Joint Photographic Experts Group) images. Two observers measured gonial angle, antegonial angle, mandibular cortical width, coronal pulp width of maxillary and mandibular first molar, tooth length of maxillary and mandibular first molar on the left side of these images twice. Fractal dimension of the selected regions of interests were calculated and the density of each panoramic radiograph as a whole were also measured on TIFF and JPEG compressed images. Intra-observer and inter-observer consistency was evaluated with Cronbach's alpha. Paired samples t-test and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to evaluate the difference between the measurements of TIFF and JPEG compressed images.
The repeatability of angular measurements had the highest Cronbach's alpha value (0.997). There was statistically significant difference for both of the observers in mandibular cortical width (MCW) measurements (1st ob. p: 0.002; 2nd ob. p: 0.003), density (p<0.001) and fractal dimension (p<0.001) between TIFF and JPEG images. There was statistically significant difference for the first observer in antegonial angle (1st ob p< 0.001) and maxillary molar coronal pulp width (1st ob. p< 0.001) between JPEG and TIFF files.
The repeatability of angular measurements is better than linear measurements. Mandibular cortical width, fractal dimension and density are affected from compression. Observer dependent factors might also cause statistically significant differences between the measurements in TIFF and JPEG images.
本研究旨在探讨图像压缩对数字全景影像密度、分形维数、线性和角度测量的影响,并评估这些测量的观察者内和观察者间重复性。
61 张 TIFF 格式(标记图像文件格式)的数字全景图像被压缩为 JPEG(联合图像专家组)图像。两位观察者两次测量这些图像左侧的下颌角、前下颌角、下颌皮质宽度、上颌和下颌第一磨牙的冠状牙髓宽度、上颌和下颌第一磨牙的牙长。计算所选感兴趣区域的分形维数,并测量 TIFF 和 JPEG 压缩图像的全景射线照片的整体密度。使用 Cronbach 的 alpha 评估观察者内和观察者间的一致性。使用配对样本 t 检验和 Kolmogorov-Smirnov 检验评估 TIFF 和 JPEG 压缩图像测量值之间的差异。
角度测量的重复性具有最高的 Cronbach 的 alpha 值(0.997)。两位观察者的下颌皮质宽度(MCW)测量值(第一观察者 p:0.002;第二观察者 p:0.003)、密度(p<0.001)和分形维数(p<0.001)在 TIFF 和 JPEG 图像之间存在统计学显著差异。第一观察者的前下颌角(第一观察者 p<0.001)和上颌磨牙冠状牙髓宽度(第一观察者 p<0.001)在 JPEG 和 TIFF 文件之间也存在统计学显著差异。
角度测量的重复性优于线性测量。下颌皮质宽度、分形维数和密度受压缩影响。观察者依赖因素也可能导致 TIFF 和 JPEG 图像测量值之间存在统计学显著差异。