University of Connecticut, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Storrs Connecticut, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043554. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
Molecular and morphological data regarding the relationships among the three classes of Rotifera (Bdelloidea, Seisonidea, and Monogononta) and the phylum Acanthocephala are inconclusive. In particular, Bdelloidea lacks molecular-based phylogenetic appraisal. I obtained coding sequences from the mitochondrial genomes of twelve bdelloids and two monogononts to explore the molecular phylogeny of Bdelloidea and provide insight into the relationships among lineages of Syndermata (Rotifera + Acanthocephala). With additional sequences taken from previously published mitochondrial genomes, the total dataset included nine species of bdelloids, three species of monogononts, and two species of acanthocephalans. A supermatrix of these 10-12 mitochondrial proteins consistently recovered a bdelloid phylogeny that questions the validity of a generally accepted classification scheme despite different methods of inference and various parameter adjustments. Specifically, results showed that neither the family Philodinidae nor the order Philodinida are monophyletic as currently defined. The application of a similar analytical strategy to assess syndermate relationships recovered either a tree with Bdelloidea and Monogononta as sister taxa (Eurotatoria) or Bdelloidea and Acanthocephala as sister taxa (Lemniscea). Both outgroup choice and method of inference affected the topological outcome emphasizing the need for sequences from more closely related outgroups and more sophisticated methods of analysis that can account for the complexity of the data.
关于轮形动物门(蛭形目、旋轮虫目和单巢目)和棘头动物门之间关系的分子和形态学数据尚无定论。特别是蛭形目缺乏基于分子的系统发育评估。我从 12 种蛭形动物和 2 种单巢目动物的线粒体基因组中获得了编码序列,以探讨蛭形动物的分子系统发育,并深入了解 Syndermata(轮形动物门+棘头动物门)的谱系关系。通过从以前发表的线粒体基因组中获取额外的序列,总数据集包括 9 种蛭形动物、3 种单巢目动物和 2 种棘头动物。这些 10-12 种线粒体蛋白的超矩阵一致地恢复了一个蛭形动物的系统发育,这表明尽管使用了不同的推断方法和各种参数调整,当前普遍接受的分类方案的有效性受到质疑。具体来说,结果表明,无论是 Philodinidae 科还是 Philodinida 目,都不像目前所定义的那样是单系的。将类似的分析策略应用于评估 Syndermata 的关系,恢复的树要么是将蛭形动物和单巢目动物作为姐妹分类群(Eurotatoria),要么是将蛭形动物和棘头动物作为姐妹分类群(Lemniscea)。外群选择和推断方法都影响拓扑结果,强调需要来自更密切相关的外群的序列和更复杂的分析方法,以解释数据的复杂性。