Duke University Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Box 3939, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Dec 4;157(11):796-807. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-10-201211200-00532.
New oral anticoagulants (NOACs), including direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) and factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors, are emerging alternatives for prophylaxis and treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE).
To compare the benefits and harms of NOACs versus warfarin for AF and VTE.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from January 2001 through July 2012; U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) database for adverse event reports.
English-language, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NOACs with warfarin for management of AF or VTE and observational studies and FDA reports on adverse effects.
Two independent reviewers abstracted data and rated study quality and strength of evidence.
Six good-quality RCTs compared NOACs (2 DTI studies, 4 FXa inhibitor studies) with warfarin. In AF, NOACs decreased all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR], 0.88 [95% CI, 0.82 to 0.96]); in VTE, NOACs did not differ for mortality or VTE outcomes. Across indications, adverse effects of NOACs compared with warfarin were fatal bleeding (RR, 0.60 [CI, 0.46 to 0.77]), major bleeding (RR, 0.80 [CI, 0.63 to 1.01]), gastrointestinal bleeding (RR, 1.30 [CI, 0.97 to 1.73]), and discontinuation due to adverse events (RR, 1.23 [CI, 1.05 to 1.44]). Subgroup analyses suggest a higher risk for myocardial infarction with DTIs than with FXa inhibitors. Bleeding risk for NOACs may be increased in persons older than 75 years or those receiving warfarin who have good control.
There were no head-to-head comparisons of NOACs and limited data on harms.
New oral anticoagulants are a viable option for patients receiving long-term anticoagulation. Treatment benefits compared with warfarin are small and vary depending on the control achieved by warfarin treatment.
Department of Veterans Affairs.
新型口服抗凝剂(NOACs),包括直接凝血酶抑制剂(DTIs)和因子 Xa(FXa)抑制剂,正在成为预防和治疗房颤(AF)和静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的替代选择。
比较 NOACs 与华法林在房颤和 VTE 中的疗效和安全性。
2001 年 1 月至 2012 年 7 月的 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 系统评价数据库;美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)不良事件报告数据库。
比较 NOACs 与华法林治疗 AF 或 VTE 的英语随机对照试验(RCTs)和观察性研究以及 FDA 关于不良影响的报告。
两名独立的审稿人提取数据并评估研究质量和证据强度。
6 项高质量 RCT 比较了 NOACs(2 项 DTI 研究,4 项 FXa 抑制剂研究)与华法林。在房颤中,NOACs 降低全因死亡率(风险比 [RR],0.88 [95%CI,0.82 至 0.96]);在 VTE 中,NOACs 在死亡率或 VTE 结局方面没有差异。在所有适应证中,与华法林相比,NOACs 的不良反应为致命性出血(RR,0.60 [CI,0.46 至 0.77])、大出血(RR,0.80 [CI,0.63 至 1.01])、胃肠道出血(RR,1.30 [CI,0.97 至 1.73])和因不良事件停药(RR,1.23 [CI,1.05 至 1.44])。亚组分析表明,DTIs 导致心肌梗死的风险高于 FXa 抑制剂。年龄大于 75 岁或正在接受华法林治疗且控制良好的患者,NOACs 的出血风险可能增加。
没有 NOACs 与华法林的直接比较,且关于危害的数据有限。
新型口服抗凝剂是接受长期抗凝治疗患者的可行选择。与华法林相比,治疗益处较小,且取决于华法林治疗的控制效果。
美国退伍军人事务部。