Suppr超能文献

华法林与新型口服抗凝剂治疗心房颤动和静脉血栓栓塞症的疗效比较:系统评价。

Comparative effectiveness of warfarin and new oral anticoagulants for the management of atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism: a systematic review.

机构信息

Duke University Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Box 3939, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2012 Dec 4;157(11):796-807. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-10-201211200-00532.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

New oral anticoagulants (NOACs), including direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) and factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors, are emerging alternatives for prophylaxis and treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE).

PURPOSE

To compare the benefits and harms of NOACs versus warfarin for AF and VTE.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from January 2001 through July 2012; U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) database for adverse event reports.

STUDY SELECTION

English-language, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NOACs with warfarin for management of AF or VTE and observational studies and FDA reports on adverse effects.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two independent reviewers abstracted data and rated study quality and strength of evidence.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Six good-quality RCTs compared NOACs (2 DTI studies, 4 FXa inhibitor studies) with warfarin. In AF, NOACs decreased all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR], 0.88 [95% CI, 0.82 to 0.96]); in VTE, NOACs did not differ for mortality or VTE outcomes. Across indications, adverse effects of NOACs compared with warfarin were fatal bleeding (RR, 0.60 [CI, 0.46 to 0.77]), major bleeding (RR, 0.80 [CI, 0.63 to 1.01]), gastrointestinal bleeding (RR, 1.30 [CI, 0.97 to 1.73]), and discontinuation due to adverse events (RR, 1.23 [CI, 1.05 to 1.44]). Subgroup analyses suggest a higher risk for myocardial infarction with DTIs than with FXa inhibitors. Bleeding risk for NOACs may be increased in persons older than 75 years or those receiving warfarin who have good control.

LIMITATION

There were no head-to-head comparisons of NOACs and limited data on harms.

CONCLUSION

New oral anticoagulants are a viable option for patients receiving long-term anticoagulation. Treatment benefits compared with warfarin are small and vary depending on the control achieved by warfarin treatment.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Department of Veterans Affairs.

摘要

背景

新型口服抗凝剂(NOACs),包括直接凝血酶抑制剂(DTIs)和因子 Xa(FXa)抑制剂,正在成为预防和治疗房颤(AF)和静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的替代选择。

目的

比较 NOACs 与华法林在房颤和 VTE 中的疗效和安全性。

数据来源

2001 年 1 月至 2012 年 7 月的 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 系统评价数据库;美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)不良事件报告数据库。

研究选择

比较 NOACs 与华法林治疗 AF 或 VTE 的英语随机对照试验(RCTs)和观察性研究以及 FDA 关于不良影响的报告。

数据提取

两名独立的审稿人提取数据并评估研究质量和证据强度。

数据综合

6 项高质量 RCT 比较了 NOACs(2 项 DTI 研究,4 项 FXa 抑制剂研究)与华法林。在房颤中,NOACs 降低全因死亡率(风险比 [RR],0.88 [95%CI,0.82 至 0.96]);在 VTE 中,NOACs 在死亡率或 VTE 结局方面没有差异。在所有适应证中,与华法林相比,NOACs 的不良反应为致命性出血(RR,0.60 [CI,0.46 至 0.77])、大出血(RR,0.80 [CI,0.63 至 1.01])、胃肠道出血(RR,1.30 [CI,0.97 至 1.73])和因不良事件停药(RR,1.23 [CI,1.05 至 1.44])。亚组分析表明,DTIs 导致心肌梗死的风险高于 FXa 抑制剂。年龄大于 75 岁或正在接受华法林治疗且控制良好的患者,NOACs 的出血风险可能增加。

局限性

没有 NOACs 与华法林的直接比较,且关于危害的数据有限。

结论

新型口服抗凝剂是接受长期抗凝治疗患者的可行选择。与华法林相比,治疗益处较小,且取决于华法林治疗的控制效果。

主要资金来源

美国退伍军人事务部。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验