Suppr超能文献

检验关于墨西哥-美国边境的火山气候假说。

Testing a pyroclimatic hypothesis on the Mexico-United States border.

机构信息

School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, P.O. Box 15018, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011, USA.

出版信息

Ecology. 2012 Aug;93(8):1830-40. doi: 10.1890/11-1991.1.

Abstract

The "pyroclimatic hypothesis" proposed by F. Biondi and colleagues provides a basis for testable expectations about climatic and other controls of fire regimes. This hypothesis asserts an a priori relationship between the occurrence of widespread fire and values of a relevant climatic index. Such a hypothesis provides the basis for predicting spatial and temporal patterns of fire occurrence based on climatic control. Forests near the Mexico-United States border offer a place to test the relative influence of climatic and other controls in mountain ranges that are ecologically similar and subject to broadly similar top-down climatic influence, but with differing cultural influences. We tested the pyroclimatic hypothesis by comparing fire history information from the Mesa de las Guacamayas, a mountain range in northwestern Chihuahua, with previously published fire data from the Chiricahua Mountains, in southeastern Arizona, approximately 150 km away. We developed a priori hypothetical models of fire occurrence and compared their performance to empirical climate-based models. Fires were frequent at all Mesa de las Guacamayas study sites through the mid-20th century and continued uninterrupted to the present at one site, in contrast to nearly complete fire exclusion after 1892 at sites in the Chiricahua Mountains. The empirical regression models explained a higher proportion of the variability in fire regime associated with climate than did the a priori models. Actual climate-fire relationships diverged in each country after 1892. The a priori models predicted continuing fires at the same rate per century as prior to 1892; fires did in fact continue in Mexico, albeit with some alteration of fire regimes, but ceased in the United States, most likely due to changes in land use. The cross-border comparison confirms that a frequent-fire regime could cease without a climatic cause, supporting previous arguments that bottom-up factors such as livestock grazing can rapidly and drastically alter surface fire regimes. Understanding the historical patterns of climate controls on fire could inform the use of historical data as ecological reference conditions and for future sustainability.

摘要

“火积气候假说”由 F. Biondi 及其同事提出,为气候及其他火发生因素的可检验预期提供了依据。该假说断言,广泛火的发生与相关气候指数值之间存在一种先验关系。这种假说为基于气候控制预测火发生的时空模式提供了基础。美墨边境附近的森林为检验气候和其他控制因素在生态相似且受相似的自上而下气候影响的山脉中的相对影响提供了一个场所,但文化影响不同。我们通过将位于奇瓦瓦州西北部 Mesa de las Guacamayas 的火历史信息与之前发表的位于亚利桑那州东南部 Chiricahua 山脉的火数据进行比较,检验了火积气候假说。我们开发了火发生的先验假设模型,并将其性能与基于经验的气候模型进行了比较。与 Chiricahua 山脉的情况相反,在 Mesa de las Guacamayas 的所有研究地点,火在整个 20 世纪中期都很频繁,并且在一个地点一直持续到现在,而在 Chiricahua 山脉的地点,自 1892 年以来几乎完全没有发生火灾。经验回归模型比先验模型更好地解释了与气候相关的火发生模式的可变性。1892 年后,两国的实际气候-火灾关系都出现了分歧。先验模型预测,在同一世纪内,火将以与 1892 年之前相同的速度继续发生;实际上,墨西哥的火确实仍在继续,尽管火发生模式发生了一些变化,但美国的火已经停止,这很可能是由于土地利用的变化。跨境比较证实,即使没有气候原因,频繁的火发生也可能停止,这支持了先前的观点,即牲畜放牧等自下而上的因素可以迅速而剧烈地改变地表火发生模式。了解气候对火的控制的历史模式可以为利用历史数据作为生态参考条件和未来可持续性提供信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验