Waterman Brian, Walker John J, Swaims Chad, Shortt Michael, Todd Michael S, Machen Shaun M, Owens Brett D
Department of Orthopaedics, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, Texas, USA.
J Knee Surg. 2012 May;25(2):155-60. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299650.
While cryotherapy has been shown to decrease postoperative pain after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, less is known of the effects of combined cryotherapy and compression. The goal of this study was to compare subjective and objective patient outcomes following ACL reconstruction with combined compression and cryotherapy compared with traditional ice therapy alone. Patients undergoing ACL reconstruction were randomized to cryotherapy/compression device (group 1) or a standardized ice pack (group 2). Both groups were instructed to use the ice or cryotherapy/compression device three times per day and return to the clinic at 1, 2, and 6 weeks postoperatively. Patient-derived outcome measurements used in this study consisted of the visual analog scale (VAS), the Lysholm knee score, Short Form-36 (SF-36), and single assessment numerical evaluation (SANE). Circumferential measurements of the knee at three locations (1 cm proximal to patella, mid-patella, and 1 cm distal to patella) were also obtained as a measure of postoperative edema. Narcotic medication use was recorded by questionnaire. The primary outcome measure (VAS) was significantly different among groups in the preoperative measurement, despite similarities in group demographics. Baseline VAS for group 1 was 54.9 compared with group 2 at 35.6 (p = 0.01). By 6 weeks, this had lowered to 28.1 and 40.3, respectively, resulting in a significant 27-point decrease in mean VAS for group 1 (p < 0.0001). However, the small increase in VAS for group 2 was not significant (p = 0.34). No significant differences were noted for the Lysholm, SF-36, or SANE scores either between groups or time points. Furthermore, no significant differences were noted for any of the circumferential measurements either between groups or time points. Of all patients, 83% of group 1 discontinued narcotic use by 6 weeks, compared with only 28% of group 2 (p = 0.0008). The use of combined cryotherapy and compression in the postoperative period after ACL reconstruction results in improved, short-term pain relief and a greater likelihood of independence from narcotic use compared with cryotherapy alone.
虽然冷冻疗法已被证明可减轻前交叉韧带(ACL)重建术后的疼痛,但对于联合冷冻疗法和加压疗法的效果却知之甚少。本研究的目的是比较ACL重建术后联合加压和冷冻疗法与单纯传统冰敷疗法相比,患者主观和客观的预后情况。接受ACL重建的患者被随机分为冷冻疗法/加压装置组(第1组)或标准冰袋组(第2组)。两组均被指示每天使用冰袋或冷冻疗法/加压装置三次,并在术后1周、2周和6周返回诊所。本研究中使用的患者自评结局指标包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Lysholm膝关节评分、简明健康状况调查量表(SF-36)和单项评估数值评定法(SANE)。还获取了膝关节三个位置(髌骨近端1 cm、髌骨中点、髌骨远端1 cm)的周径测量值,作为术后水肿的一项指标。通过问卷记录麻醉药物的使用情况。尽管两组人口统计学特征相似,但术前测量时,主要结局指标(VAS)在两组间存在显著差异。第1组的基线VAS为54.9,而第2组为35.6(p = 0.01)。到6周时,这一数值分别降至28.1和40.3,第1组的平均VAS显著下降了27分(p < 0.0001)。然而,第2组VAS的小幅增加并不显著(p = 0.34)。两组之间或不同时间点的Lysholm、SF-36或SANE评分均未发现显著差异。此外,两组之间或不同时间点的任何周径测量值均未发现显著差异。在所有患者中,第1组83%的患者在6周时停止使用麻醉药物,而第2组仅为28%(p = 0.0008)。与单纯冷冻疗法相比,ACL重建术后联合使用冷冻疗法和加压疗法可在短期内改善疼痛缓解情况,且更有可能不再依赖麻醉药物。