• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

行动者、观察者与任务持续时间的估计

Actors, observers, and the estimation of task duration.

作者信息

Roy Michael M, Christenfeld Nicholas J S, Jones Meghan

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Elizabethtown College, Elizabethtown, PA 17601, USA.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(1):121-37. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.699973. Epub 2012 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1080/17470218.2012.699973
PMID:22928697
Abstract

People are often wrong in estimating both how long tasks have taken in the past and how long they will take in the future. Bias could be due to factors such as task involvement, an individual's engagement or motivation in completing the task, or aspects of the task such as its relative duration or memory storage size associated with it. We examined time estimation bias in actors (likely to experience high levels of task involvement) and observers (likely to experience low levels of task involvement) for both predictions of and memory of task duration. Results suggest that bias appears to be due to memory storage size rather than to involvement with the task.

摘要

人们在估计过去任务所花费的时间以及未来任务将花费的时间时常常出错。偏差可能归因于诸如任务参与度、个体完成任务的投入程度或动机等因素,或者任务的某些方面,如任务的相对持续时间或与之相关的记忆存储量。我们研究了参与者(可能经历高任务参与度)和观察者(可能经历低任务参与度)在任务持续时间预测和记忆方面的时间估计偏差。结果表明,偏差似乎是由于记忆存储量而非任务参与度所致。

相似文献

1
Actors, observers, and the estimation of task duration.行动者、观察者与任务持续时间的估计
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(1):121-37. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.699973. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
2
A further analysis of time bisection behavior in children with and without reference memory: the similarity and the partition task.对有和没有参照记忆的儿童时间二等分行为的进一步分析:相似性和划分任务。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2007 Jun;125(2):240-56. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.08.003. Epub 2006 Oct 23.
3
Timing in multitasking: memory contamination and time pressure bias.多任务处理中的时间安排:记忆污染和时间压力偏差。
Cogn Psychol. 2013 Aug-Sep;67(1-2):26-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jul 27.
4
Time perception: manipulation of task difficulty dissociates clock functions from other cognitive demands.时间感知:任务难度的操控将时钟功能与其他认知需求区分开来。
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jan 28;45(2):321-31. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.033. Epub 2006 Aug 24.
5
Underestimating the duration of future events: memory incorrectly used or memory bias?低估未来事件的持续时间:记忆使用不当还是记忆偏差?
Psychol Bull. 2005 Sep;131(5):738-56. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.738.
6
Stimulus timing by people with Parkinson's disease.帕金森病患者的刺激时机。
Brain Cogn. 2008 Aug;67(3):264-79. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.01.010. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
7
Bias in memory predicts bias in estimation of future task duration.记忆偏差预示着对未来任务持续时间估计的偏差。
Mem Cognit. 2007 Apr;35(3):557-64. doi: 10.3758/bf03193294.
8
Correcting memory improves accuracy of predicted task duration.校正记忆可提高预测任务持续时间的准确性。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2008 Sep;14(3):266-75. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.14.3.266.
9
The predictive value of the leveling off of within session performance for procedural memory consolidation.训练过程中表现趋于平稳对程序性记忆巩固的预测价值。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Jul;24(2):181-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.01.012.
10
Timing, storage, and comparison of stimulus duration engage discrete anatomical components of a perceptual timing network.刺激持续时间的计时、存储和比较涉及感知计时网络的离散解剖成分。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Dec;20(12):2185-97. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20153.

引用本文的文献

1
The return trip is felt shorter only postdictively: A psychophysiological study of the return trip effect [corrected].返程之旅只有在事后回顾时才会让人感觉更短:返程效应的心理生理学研究[已修正]
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 10;10(6):e0127779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127779. eCollection 2015.
2
Belief in optimism might be more problematic than actual optimism.对乐观主义的信仰可能比实际的乐观主义更成问题。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 19;5:624. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00624. eCollection 2014.