Suppr超能文献

髌周电灼术能否改善全膝关节置换术后的疗效?一项前瞻性、随机、双盲对照试验。

Does circumpatellar electrocautery improve the outcome after total knee replacement?: a prospective, randomised, blinded controlled trial.

作者信息

Baliga S, McNair C J, Barnett K J, MacLeod J, Humphry R W, Finlayson D

机构信息

Raigmore Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, Inverness IV2 3UJ, UK.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Sep;94(9):1228-33. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B9.27662.

Abstract

The incidence of anterior knee pain following total knee replacement (TKR) is reported to be as high as 49%. The source of the pain is poorly understood but the soft tissues around the patella have been implicated. In theory circumferential electrocautery denervates the patella thereby reducing efferent pain signals. However, there is mixed evidence that this practice translates into improved outcomes. We aimed to investigate the clinical effect of intra-operative circumpatellar electrocautery in patients undergoing TKR using the LCS mobile bearing or Kinemax fixed bearing TKR. A total of 200 patients were randomised to receive either circumpatellar electrocautery (diathermy) or not (control). Patients were assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) for anterior knee pain and Oxford knee score (OKS) pre-operatively and three months, six months and one year post-operatively. Patients and assessors were blinded. There were 91 patients in the diathermy group and 94 in the control. The mean VAS improvement at one year was 3.9 in both groups (control; -10 to 6, diathermy; -9 to 8, p < 0.001 in both cases, paired, two-tailed t-test). There was no significant difference in VAS between the groups at any other time. The mean OKS improvement was 17.7 points (0 to 34) in the intervention group and 16.6 (0 to 42) points in the control (p = 0.36). There was no significant difference between the two groups in OKS at any other time. We found no relevant effect of patellar electrocautery on either VAS anterior knee pain or OKS for patients undergoing LCS and Kinemax TKR.

摘要

据报道,全膝关节置换术(TKR)后前膝痛的发生率高达49%。疼痛来源尚不清楚,但已发现髌骨周围的软组织与此有关。理论上,环形电灼可使髌骨去神经化,从而减少传出性疼痛信号。然而,关于这种做法是否能改善疗效,证据并不一致。我们旨在研究在接受LCS活动平台或Kinemax固定平台TKR的患者中,术中环形髌骨电灼的临床效果。总共200例患者被随机分为接受环形髌骨电灼(透热疗法)组或不接受电灼组(对照组)。术前以及术后三个月、六个月和一年,通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估患者前膝痛情况,并采用牛津膝关节评分(OKS)进行评估。患者和评估者均处于盲态。电灼组有91例患者,对照组有94例患者。两组在一年时VAS的平均改善程度均为3.9(对照组:-10至6,电灼组:-9至8,两种情况均p<0.001,配对双尾t检验)。在其他任何时间,两组之间的VAS均无显著差异。干预组OKS的平均改善为17.7分(0至34),对照组为16.6分(0至42)(p = 0.36)。在其他任何时间,两组之间的OKS均无显著差异。我们发现,对于接受LCS和Kinemax TKR的患者,髌骨电灼对VAS前膝痛或OKS均无相关影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验