Suppr超能文献

比较成熟泥敷疗法与热敷疗法对膝骨关节炎的疗效。

Comparing the efficacy of mature mud pack and hot pack treatments for knee osteoarthritis.

作者信息

Sarsan Ayşe, Akkaya Nuray, Ozgen Merih, Yildiz Necmettin, Atalay Nilgun Simsir, Ardic Fusun

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.

出版信息

J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2012;25(3):193-9. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2012-0327.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of mature mud pack and hot pack therapies on patients with knee osteoarthritis.

DESIGN

This study was designed as a prospective, randomized-controlled, and single-blinded clinical trial. Twenty-seven patients with clinical and radiologic evidence of knee osteoarthritis were randomly assigned into two groups and were treated with mature mud packs (n 15) or hot packs (n=12). Patients were evaluated for pain [based on the visual analog scale (VAS)], function (WOMAC, 6 min walking distance), quality of life [Short Form-36 (SF-36)], and serum levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) at baseline, post-treatment, and 3 and 6~months after treatment.

RESULTS

The mud pack group shows a significant improvement in VAS, pain, stifness, and physical function domains of WOMAC. The difference between groups of pain and physical activity domains is significant at post-treatment in favor of mud pack. For a 6 min walking distance, mud pack shows significant improvement, and the difference is significant between groups in favor of mud pack at post-treatment and 3 and 6 months after treatment. Mud pack shows significant improvement in the pain subscale of SF-36 at the third month continuing until the sixth month after the treatment. Significant improvements are found for the social function, vitality/energy, physical role disability, and general health subscales of SF-36 in favor of the mud pack compared with the hot pack group at post-treatment. A significant increase is detected for IGF-1 in the mud pack group 3 months after treatment compared with the baseline, and the difference is significant between groups 3 months after the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Mud pack is a favorable option compared with hotpack for pain relief and for the improvement of functional conditions in treating patients with knee osteoarthritis.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较成熟泥敷疗法与热敷疗法对膝骨关节炎患者的疗效。

设计

本研究设计为一项前瞻性、随机对照、单盲临床试验。27例有膝骨关节炎临床和影像学证据的患者被随机分为两组,分别接受成熟泥敷(n = 15)或热敷(n = 12)治疗。在基线、治疗后、治疗后3个月和6个月时,对患者进行疼痛评估[基于视觉模拟量表(VAS)]、功能评估(WOMAC、6分钟步行距离)、生活质量评估[简明健康状况调查量表(SF - 36)]以及肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)和胰岛素样生长因子-1(IGF-1)血清水平评估。

结果

泥敷组在VAS、疼痛、僵硬以及WOMAC的身体功能领域有显著改善。治疗后,疼痛和身体活动领域两组间差异显著,泥敷组更具优势。对于6分钟步行距离,泥敷组有显著改善,治疗后、治疗后3个月和6个月时两组间差异显著,泥敷组更具优势。泥敷组在治疗后第3个月直至第6个月时,SF - 36疼痛子量表有显著改善。与热敷组相比,治疗后泥敷组在SF - 36的社会功能、活力/精力、身体角色功能障碍和总体健康子量表方面有显著改善。与基线相比,泥敷组在治疗后3个月时IGF-1显著升高,治疗后3个月两组间差异显著。

结论

与热敷相比,泥敷是缓解膝骨关节炎患者疼痛和改善功能状况的更佳选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验