Sarsan Ayşe, Akkaya Nuray, Ozgen Merih, Yildiz Necmettin, Atalay Nilgun Simsir, Ardic Fusun
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2012;25(3):193-9. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2012-0327.
The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of mature mud pack and hot pack therapies on patients with knee osteoarthritis.
This study was designed as a prospective, randomized-controlled, and single-blinded clinical trial. Twenty-seven patients with clinical and radiologic evidence of knee osteoarthritis were randomly assigned into two groups and were treated with mature mud packs (n 15) or hot packs (n=12). Patients were evaluated for pain [based on the visual analog scale (VAS)], function (WOMAC, 6 min walking distance), quality of life [Short Form-36 (SF-36)], and serum levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) at baseline, post-treatment, and 3 and 6~months after treatment.
The mud pack group shows a significant improvement in VAS, pain, stifness, and physical function domains of WOMAC. The difference between groups of pain and physical activity domains is significant at post-treatment in favor of mud pack. For a 6 min walking distance, mud pack shows significant improvement, and the difference is significant between groups in favor of mud pack at post-treatment and 3 and 6 months after treatment. Mud pack shows significant improvement in the pain subscale of SF-36 at the third month continuing until the sixth month after the treatment. Significant improvements are found for the social function, vitality/energy, physical role disability, and general health subscales of SF-36 in favor of the mud pack compared with the hot pack group at post-treatment. A significant increase is detected for IGF-1 in the mud pack group 3 months after treatment compared with the baseline, and the difference is significant between groups 3 months after the treatment.
Mud pack is a favorable option compared with hotpack for pain relief and for the improvement of functional conditions in treating patients with knee osteoarthritis.
本研究旨在比较成熟泥敷疗法与热敷疗法对膝骨关节炎患者的疗效。
本研究设计为一项前瞻性、随机对照、单盲临床试验。27例有膝骨关节炎临床和影像学证据的患者被随机分为两组,分别接受成熟泥敷(n = 15)或热敷(n = 12)治疗。在基线、治疗后、治疗后3个月和6个月时,对患者进行疼痛评估[基于视觉模拟量表(VAS)]、功能评估(WOMAC、6分钟步行距离)、生活质量评估[简明健康状况调查量表(SF - 36)]以及肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)和胰岛素样生长因子-1(IGF-1)血清水平评估。
泥敷组在VAS、疼痛、僵硬以及WOMAC的身体功能领域有显著改善。治疗后,疼痛和身体活动领域两组间差异显著,泥敷组更具优势。对于6分钟步行距离,泥敷组有显著改善,治疗后、治疗后3个月和6个月时两组间差异显著,泥敷组更具优势。泥敷组在治疗后第3个月直至第6个月时,SF - 36疼痛子量表有显著改善。与热敷组相比,治疗后泥敷组在SF - 36的社会功能、活力/精力、身体角色功能障碍和总体健康子量表方面有显著改善。与基线相比,泥敷组在治疗后3个月时IGF-1显著升高,治疗后3个月两组间差异显著。
与热敷相比,泥敷是缓解膝骨关节炎患者疼痛和改善功能状况的更佳选择。