• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Completeness of prostate cancer staging in the Danish Cancer Registry, 2004-2009.2004-2009 年丹麦癌症登记处前列腺癌分期的完整性。
Clin Epidemiol. 2012;4 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):17-23. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S32004. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
2
Completeness of bladder cancer staging in the Danish Cancer Registry, 2004-2009.丹麦癌症登记处 2004-2009 年膀胱癌分期的完整性。
Clin Epidemiol. 2012;4 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):25-31. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S31542. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
3
Completeness of TNM cancer staging for melanoma in the Danish Cancer Registry, 2004-2009.丹麦癌症登记处 2004-2009 年黑色素瘤的 TNM 癌症分期完整性。
Clin Epidemiol. 2012;4 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):5-10. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S32064. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
4
Completeness of breast cancer staging in the Danish Cancer Registry, 2004-2009.丹麦癌症登记处 2004-2009 年乳腺癌分期的完整性。
Clin Epidemiol. 2012;4 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):11-6. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S31574. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
5
Completeness of TNM staging of small-cell and non-small-cell lung cancer in the Danish cancer registry, 2004-2009.2004-2009 年丹麦癌症登记处中小细胞肺癌和非小细胞肺癌的 TNM 分期完整性。
Clin Epidemiol. 2012;4 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):39-44. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S33315. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
6
Assessing a modified-AJCC TNM staging system in the New South Wales Cancer Registry, Australia.评估澳大利亚新南威尔士癌症登记处的改良-AJCC TNM 分期系统。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Aug 28;19(1):850. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6062-x.
7
Influence of various assumptions for the individual TNM components on the TNM stage using Nordic cancer registry data.利用北欧癌症登记数据,各种关于个体TNM组成部分的假设对TNM分期的影响。
Acta Oncol. 2023 Mar;62(3):215-222. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2023.2189528. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
8
Quality assessment of prostate cancer reports to the Danish Cancer Registry.提交给丹麦癌症登记处的前列腺癌报告的质量评估。
Acta Oncol. 2016;55(1):24-9. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1054948. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
9
Hydatidiform mole: validity of the registration in the Danish National Patient Registry, the Danish Cancer Registry, and the Danish Pathology Registry 1999-2009.葡萄胎:1999 - 2009年在丹麦国家患者登记处、丹麦癌症登记处和丹麦病理登记处登记的有效性
Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Sep 18;10:1223-1231. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S169657. eCollection 2018.
10
Tumour staging of oesophageal cancer in the Swedish Cancer Registry: A nationwide validation study.瑞典癌症登记处食管癌的肿瘤分期:一项全国性验证研究。
Acta Oncol. 2015 Jun;54(6):903-8. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1020968. Epub 2015 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining the Completeness of Breast Cancer Pathology Reports Registered in the Population-Based Cancer Registration System in Iran during 2016 to 2018.审查2016年至2018年期间在伊朗基于人群的癌症登记系统中登记的乳腺癌病理报告的完整性。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2024 May 29;38:61. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.38.61. eCollection 2024.
2
Prognostic consequences of implementing cancer patient pathways in Denmark: a comparative cohort study of symptomatic cancer patients in primary care.丹麦实施癌症患者路径的预后后果:初级保健中症状性癌症患者的对比队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Sep 6;17(1):627. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3623-8.
3
Tumour stage and implementation of standardised cancer patient pathways: a comparative cohort study.肿瘤分期与标准化癌症患者诊疗路径的实施:一项队列对比研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Jun;66(647):e434-43. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X684805. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
4
Completeness of T, N, M and stage grouping for all cancers in the Mallorca Cancer Registry.马略卡癌症登记处所有癌症的T、N、M及分期分组的完整性。
BMC Cancer. 2015 Nov 4;15:847. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1849-x.
5
Cancer Mortality in People Treated with Antidepressants before Cancer Diagnosis: A Population Based Cohort Study.癌症诊断前接受抗抑郁药治疗人群的癌症死亡率:一项基于人群的队列研究。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 14;10(9):e0138134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138134. eCollection 2015.
6
Existing data sources for clinical epidemiology: Danish Cancer in Primary Care cohort.临床流行病学现有数据源:丹麦初级保健中的癌症队列。
Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jul 17;6:237-46. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S62855. eCollection 2014.
7
Mortality after cancer among patients with diabetes mellitus: effect of diabetes duration and treatment.糖尿病患者癌症后的死亡率:糖尿病病程和治疗的影响。
Diabetologia. 2014 May;57(5):927-34. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3186-z. Epub 2014 Mar 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Bias due to missing SEER data in D'Amico risk stratification of prostate cancer.由于 SEER 数据缺失导致 D'Amico 前列腺癌风险分层存在偏倚。
J Urol. 2012 Jun;187(6):2026-31. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.01.070. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
2
Cancer statistics, 2012.癌症统计数据,2012 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 Jan-Feb;62(1):10-29. doi: 10.3322/caac.20138. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
3
Staging of prostate cancer.前列腺癌分期。
Histopathology. 2012 Jan;60(1):87-117. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.04025.x.
4
Performance characteristics of computed tomography in detecting lymph node metastases in contemporary patients with prostate cancer treated with extended pelvic lymph node dissection.当代接受扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗的前列腺癌患者中 CT 检测淋巴结转移的性能特征。
Eur Urol. 2012 Jun;61(6):1132-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.11.008. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
5
Tumor staging and grading: a primer.肿瘤分期与分级:入门指南。
Methods Mol Biol. 2012;823:1-18. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-216-2_1.
6
Unstaged cancer in the United States: a population-based study.美国未分期癌症:一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Cancer. 2011 Sep 21;11:402. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-402.
7
The Danish Cancer Registry.丹麦癌症登记处。
Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(7 Suppl):42-5. doi: 10.1177/1403494810393562.
8
The Danish National Patient Register.丹麦国家患者登记处。
Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(7 Suppl):30-3. doi: 10.1177/1403494811401482.
9
The Danish Civil Registration System.丹麦民事登记系统。
Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(7 Suppl):22-5. doi: 10.1177/1403494810387965.
10
The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients.基于人群的丹麦国家患者登记处使用 ICD-10 诊断编码评估 Charlson 合并症指数疾病的预测价值。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 May 28;11:83. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-83.

2004-2009 年丹麦癌症登记处前列腺癌分期的完整性。

Completeness of prostate cancer staging in the Danish Cancer Registry, 2004-2009.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus.

出版信息

Clin Epidemiol. 2012;4 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):17-23. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S32004. Epub 2012 Aug 17.

DOI:10.2147/CLEP.S32004
PMID:22936853
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3429153/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the completeness of TNM (Tumor-Node-Metastasis) staging for prostate cancer (PC) in the Danish Cancer Registry (DCR).

METHODS

We identified 20,184 men registered with first-time PC in the DCR between 2004 and 2009. These patients were linked to the Danish National Patient Register to obtain data on comorbidity according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). We calculated the completeness and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) of TNM staging overall and by the individual components. We also defined a clinically-based algorithm classifying PC into four stage categories: localized, regional, distant, and unknown.

RESULTS

The overall completeness of TNM staging was 34.2% (95% CI: 0.34-0.35). TNM completeness improved gradually over time reaching 41.2% in 2009. TNM completeness decreased substantially with age from 75.0% among patients 0-39 years to 11.3% among patients 80 years or older. Similarly, completeness decreased with increasing comorbidity level from 37.6% among patients with low CCI to 20.3% among those with high CCI. When classifying T1 cancer as a complete registration regardless of missing N or M stage, the overall TNM completeness increased to 48.7% (95% CI: 0.48-0.49). According to the clinically-based staging algorithm, 70.5% of PC cases could be categorized into a definite clinical stage.

CONCLUSION

One-third of PC patients had a complete registration of all TNM components in the DCR. Although TNM completeness improved over time, older age and high comorbidity were consistently associated with missing TNM staging. Research and monitoring based on cancer registries such as the DCR should account for missing TNM staging. Failing to do so could otherwise lead to biased results of stage-specific analyses.

摘要

目的

研究丹麦癌症登记处(DCR)中前列腺癌(PC)的 TNM(肿瘤-淋巴结-转移)分期的完整性。

方法

我们在 2004 年至 2009 年间确定了 20184 名在 DCR 中首次登记患有 PC 的男性患者。这些患者与丹麦全国患者登记处相关联,以根据 Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)获取合并症数据。我们计算了 TNM 分期的完整性及其各个组成部分的相应 95%置信区间(CI)。我们还定义了一种基于临床的算法,将 PC 分为四个分期类别:局限性、区域性、远处和未知。

结果

TNM 分期的整体完整性为 34.2%(95%CI:0.34-0.35)。TNM 分期的完整性随着时间的推移逐渐提高,2009 年达到 41.2%。TNM 分期的完整性随着年龄的增长而大幅下降,从 0-39 岁患者的 75.0%降至 80 岁或以上患者的 11.3%。同样,随着合并症水平的增加,完整性从低 CCI 患者的 37.6%下降到高 CCI 患者的 20.3%。当将 T1 期癌症视为完整登记而不考虑缺失 N 或 M 期时,整体 TNM 完整性增加到 48.7%(95%CI:0.48-0.49)。根据基于临床的分期算法,70.5%的 PC 病例可以归入明确的临床分期。

结论

DCR 中有三分之一的 PC 患者的所有 TNM 分期均完整登记。尽管 TNM 分期的完整性随着时间的推移有所提高,但年龄较大和合并症较高始终与 TNM 分期缺失相关。基于癌症登记处(如 DCR)的研究和监测应考虑到 TNM 分期缺失。否则,否则可能会导致分期特异性分析产生有偏差的结果。