Department of Surgery, Tulane School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Surgery. 2012 Sep;152(3):489-97. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.07.029.
The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations recommendations for conducting root cause analysis (RCA) include identifying "root causes" and "common-cause variation" rather than "proximate causes" and "special-cause variation" to create interventions. Simulation for health care RCA is a novel technique but has not been compared with traditional RCA methods.
All of the RCAs of adverse events conducted at Tulane Hospital between September 2010 and September 2011 were reviewed. A case of missed postprocedural, preoperative hemorrhage resulting in death was chosen. Hospital records were analyzed to identify the presumed root causes. A simulation of the event was developed and conducted. Six test subjects (preoperative and postanesthesia care unit nurses) participated in the simulation. Root causes identified by simulation analysis were compared with those identified by traditional RCA.
In 2 of 6 simulations, the adverse event was duplicated. The root cause identified by standard RCA technique was inattention to signs of bleeding in the patient/ lack of appropriate monitoring of the patient by nursing staff ("special-cause variation"). Simulation-based RCA revealed that the root cause was not only inadequate monitoring, but also the lack of physical presence of physicians in the care environment ("common-cause variation"). Simulation-based RCA identified root causes more amenable to intervention.
This study demonstrates that simulation-based RCA can identify additional root causes amenable to making health care interventions when compared with traditional RCA.
医疗组织联合委员会(The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations)推荐进行根本原因分析(Root Cause Analysis,RCA)时,应识别“根本原因”和“共同原因变异”,而不是“近因”和“特殊原因变异”,以制定干预措施。医疗 RCA 的模拟是一种新颖的技术,但尚未与传统 RCA 方法进行比较。
回顾了 2010 年 9 月至 2011 年 9 月在杜兰医院进行的所有不良事件 RCA。选择了一例术后、术前出血漏诊导致死亡的案例。对医院记录进行分析以确定假定的根本原因。开发并进行了事件模拟。六名测试对象(术前和麻醉后护理单元护士)参加了模拟。通过模拟分析确定的根本原因与传统 RCA 确定的根本原因进行了比较。
在 6 次模拟中有 2 次重复了不良事件。标准 RCA 技术确定的根本原因是对患者出血迹象的不关注/护理人员对患者的监测不当(“特殊原因变异”)。基于模拟的 RCA 显示,根本原因不仅是监测不足,而且医生在护理环境中缺乏实际存在(“共同原因变异”)。基于模拟的 RCA 确定了更适合干预的根本原因。
这项研究表明,与传统 RCA 相比,基于模拟的 RCA 可以识别更多适合医疗干预的根本原因。