• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在早期类风湿关节炎中,增加治疗并非取决于疾病活动评分,而是取决于医生整体评估:来自 CATCH 研究的结果。

Increasing treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis is not determined by the disease activity score but by physician global assessment: results from the CATCH study.

机构信息

Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 2012 Nov;39(11):2081-7. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.120520. Epub 2012 Sep 1.

DOI:10.3899/jrheum.120520
PMID:22942265
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the factors most strongly associated with an increase in therapy of early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA).

METHODS

Data from the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) were included if the patient had ≥ 2 visits and baseline and 6 months data. A regression analysis was done to determine factors associated with treatment intensification.

RESULTS

Of 1145 patients with ERA, 790 met inclusion criteria; mean age was 53.4 years (SD 14.7), mean disease duration 6.1 months (SD 2.8), 75% were female, baseline Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) was 4.7 (SD 1.8) and 2.9 (SD 1.8) at 6 months for included patients. Univariate factors for intensifying treatment were physician global assessment (MDGA; OR 7.8 and OR 7.4 at 3 and 6 months, respectively, p < 0.0005), swollen joint count (SJC; OR 4.7 and OR 7.3 at 3 and 6 months, p < 0.0005), and DAS28 (OR 3.0 and OR 4.6 at 3 and 6 months, p < 0.0005). In the regression model only MDGA was strongly associated with treatment intensification (OR 1.5 and OR 1.2 at 3 and 6 months, p < 0.0005); DAS28 was not consistently predictive (OR 1.0, p = 0.987, and OR 1.2, p = 0.023, at 3 and 6 months). DAS28 was the reason for treatment intensification 2.3% of the time, compared to 51.7% for SJC, 49.9% for tender joint count, and 23.8% for MDGA. For the same SJC, larger joint involvement was more likely to influence treatment than small joints at 3 months (OR 1.4, p = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

MDGA was strongly associated with an increase in treatment at 3 and 6 months in ERA, whereas DAS28 was not. Physicians rarely stated that DAS28 was the reason for increasing treatment.

摘要

目的

确定与早期类风湿关节炎(ERA)治疗增加最相关的因素。

方法

如果患者有≥2 次就诊且基线和 6 个月时都有数据,则纳入加拿大早期关节炎队列(CATCH)的数据。进行回归分析以确定与治疗强化相关的因素。

结果

在 1145 例 ERA 患者中,有 790 例符合纳入标准;平均年龄为 53.4 岁(SD 14.7),平均病程为 6.1 个月(SD 2.8),75%为女性,基线 28 关节疾病活动度评分(DAS28)为 4.7(SD 1.8),纳入患者在 6 个月时分别为 2.9(SD 1.8)。治疗强化的单变量因素包括医生整体评估(MDGA;3 个月和 6 个月时的 OR 分别为 7.8 和 7.4,p <0.0005)、肿胀关节计数(SJC;3 个月和 6 个月时的 OR 分别为 4.7 和 7.3,p <0.0005)和 DAS28(3 个月和 6 个月时的 OR 分别为 3.0 和 4.6,p <0.0005)。在回归模型中,只有 MDGA 与治疗强化强烈相关(3 个月和 6 个月时的 OR 分别为 1.5 和 1.2,p <0.0005);DAS28 并不始终具有预测性(3 个月时的 OR 为 1.0,p=0.987,6 个月时的 OR 为 1.2,p=0.023)。DAS28 是治疗强化的原因占 2.3%,而 SJC 为 51.7%,压痛关节计数为 49.9%,MDGA 为 23.8%。对于相同的 SJC,3 个月时大关节受累比小关节更可能影响治疗(OR 1.4,p=0.027)。

结论

MDGA 与 ERA 患者在 3 个月和 6 个月时治疗增加强烈相关,而 DAS28 则不然。医生很少说明 DAS28 是增加治疗的原因。

相似文献

1
Increasing treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis is not determined by the disease activity score but by physician global assessment: results from the CATCH study.在早期类风湿关节炎中,增加治疗并非取决于疾病活动评分,而是取决于医生整体评估:来自 CATCH 研究的结果。
J Rheumatol. 2012 Nov;39(11):2081-7. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.120520. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
2
Physician global assessment at 3 months is strongly predictive of remission at 12 months in early rheumatoid arthritis: results from the CATCH cohort.3 个月时的医生全面评估强烈预测早期类风湿关节炎 12 个月时的缓解:来自 CATCH 队列的结果。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014 Mar;53(3):482-90. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket366. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
3
Joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis progresses in remission according to the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints and is driven by residual swollen joints.类风湿关节炎的关节损伤在缓解期会根据28个关节的疾病活动评分进展,且由残留的肿胀关节驱动。
Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Dec;63(12):3702-11. doi: 10.1002/art.30634.
4
Comparison of anti-TNF treatment initiation in rheumatoid arthritis databases demonstrates wide country variability in patient parameters at initiation of anti-TNF therapy.比较类风湿关节炎数据库中的抗 TNF 治疗起始情况表明,抗 TNF 治疗起始时患者参数在各国之间存在很大差异。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Aug;41(1):81-9. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2010.09.004. Epub 2010 Dec 17.
5
Short-term outcome after anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: do we need to revise our assessment criteria?类风湿关节炎患者接受抗肿瘤坏死因子-α治疗后的短期疗效:我们是否需要修订评估标准?
J Rheumatol. 2006 Mar;33(3):490-7.
6
Which variables best predict change in rheumatoid arthritis therapy in daily clinical practice?在日常临床实践中,哪些变量最能预测类风湿性关节炎治疗的变化?
J Rheumatol. 2006 Jul;33(7):1243-6. Epub 2006 Apr 15.
7
Gain in quality-adjusted life-years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis during 1 year of biological therapy: a prospective study in clinical practice.生物治疗 1 年内类风湿关节炎患者的质量调整生命年获益:临床实践中的前瞻性研究。
J Rheumatol. 2013 Sep;40(9):1479-86. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.121387. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
8
Clinical remission and/or minimal disease activity in patients receiving adalimumab treatment in a multinational, open-label, twelve-week study.在一项跨国、开放标签、为期12周的研究中,接受阿达木单抗治疗的患者实现临床缓解和/或最小疾病活动度。
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jan 15;59(1):32-41. doi: 10.1002/art.23247.
9
Determining best practices in early rheumatoid arthritis by comparing differences in treatment at sites in the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort.通过比较加拿大早期关节炎队列中不同站点的治疗差异,确定早期类风湿关节炎的最佳实践。
J Rheumatol. 2013 Nov;40(11):1823-30. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.121316. Epub 2013 Sep 15.
10
Are there differences between young- and older-onset early inflammatory arthritis and do these impact outcomes? An analysis from the CATCH cohort.早发性炎性关节炎的青年发病型和老年发病型之间是否存在差异,这些差异是否会影响预后?来自CATCH队列的分析。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014 Jun;53(6):1075-86. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket449.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing nurse-led and rheumatologist-led care for rheumatoid arthritis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.比较护士主导和风湿病专家主导的类风湿性关节炎患者护理:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2025 Jun 20;59:e20240186. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0186en. eCollection 2025.
2
Remission definitions guiding immunosuppressive therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: which is best fitted for the purpose?缓解定义指导类风湿关节炎的免疫抑制治疗:哪种最适合该目的?
RMD Open. 2024 Mar 4;10(1):e003972. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003972.
3
Factors associated with treatment intensification in patients with axial spondyloarthritis and high disease activity in clinical practice.
临床实践中与中轴型脊柱关节炎且疾病活动度高的患者治疗强化相关的因素。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Jan 1;64(1):91-98. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead634.
4
Treat-to-target concept implementation for evaluating rheumatoid arthritis patients in daily practice.在日常实践中评估类风湿关节炎患者的治疗达标概念实施情况。
Eur J Rheumatol. 2019 May 20;6(3):136-141. doi: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2019.18195. Print 2019 Jul.
5
Impact of intensive treatment and remission on health-related quality of life in early and established rheumatoid arthritis.强化治疗和缓解对早期和已确立的类风湿关节炎患者健康相关生活质量的影响。
RMD Open. 2016 Aug 26;2(2):e000270. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000270. eCollection 2016.
6
Factors associated with the intensification of treatment in rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice.临床实践中与类风湿关节炎强化治疗相关的因素。
Rheumatol Int. 2015 Nov;35(11):1851-5. doi: 10.1007/s00296-015-3332-z. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
7
Assessment of global disease activity in RA patients monitored in the METEOR database: the patient's versus the rheumatologist's opinion.在METEOR数据库中监测的类风湿关节炎患者的全球疾病活动评估:患者与风湿病学家的意见比较。
Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Apr;33(4):461-6. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2390-4. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
8
Rational therapy in RA: Issues in implementing a treat-to-target approach in RA.类风湿关节炎的合理治疗:类风湿关节炎中实施达标治疗方法的相关问题。
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013 Mar;9(3):137-8. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2013.18. Epub 2013 Feb 12.