Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
J Rheumatol. 2012 Nov;39(11):2081-7. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.120520. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
To determine the factors most strongly associated with an increase in therapy of early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA).
Data from the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) were included if the patient had ≥ 2 visits and baseline and 6 months data. A regression analysis was done to determine factors associated with treatment intensification.
Of 1145 patients with ERA, 790 met inclusion criteria; mean age was 53.4 years (SD 14.7), mean disease duration 6.1 months (SD 2.8), 75% were female, baseline Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) was 4.7 (SD 1.8) and 2.9 (SD 1.8) at 6 months for included patients. Univariate factors for intensifying treatment were physician global assessment (MDGA; OR 7.8 and OR 7.4 at 3 and 6 months, respectively, p < 0.0005), swollen joint count (SJC; OR 4.7 and OR 7.3 at 3 and 6 months, p < 0.0005), and DAS28 (OR 3.0 and OR 4.6 at 3 and 6 months, p < 0.0005). In the regression model only MDGA was strongly associated with treatment intensification (OR 1.5 and OR 1.2 at 3 and 6 months, p < 0.0005); DAS28 was not consistently predictive (OR 1.0, p = 0.987, and OR 1.2, p = 0.023, at 3 and 6 months). DAS28 was the reason for treatment intensification 2.3% of the time, compared to 51.7% for SJC, 49.9% for tender joint count, and 23.8% for MDGA. For the same SJC, larger joint involvement was more likely to influence treatment than small joints at 3 months (OR 1.4, p = 0.027).
MDGA was strongly associated with an increase in treatment at 3 and 6 months in ERA, whereas DAS28 was not. Physicians rarely stated that DAS28 was the reason for increasing treatment.
确定与早期类风湿关节炎(ERA)治疗增加最相关的因素。
如果患者有≥2 次就诊且基线和 6 个月时都有数据,则纳入加拿大早期关节炎队列(CATCH)的数据。进行回归分析以确定与治疗强化相关的因素。
在 1145 例 ERA 患者中,有 790 例符合纳入标准;平均年龄为 53.4 岁(SD 14.7),平均病程为 6.1 个月(SD 2.8),75%为女性,基线 28 关节疾病活动度评分(DAS28)为 4.7(SD 1.8),纳入患者在 6 个月时分别为 2.9(SD 1.8)。治疗强化的单变量因素包括医生整体评估(MDGA;3 个月和 6 个月时的 OR 分别为 7.8 和 7.4,p <0.0005)、肿胀关节计数(SJC;3 个月和 6 个月时的 OR 分别为 4.7 和 7.3,p <0.0005)和 DAS28(3 个月和 6 个月时的 OR 分别为 3.0 和 4.6,p <0.0005)。在回归模型中,只有 MDGA 与治疗强化强烈相关(3 个月和 6 个月时的 OR 分别为 1.5 和 1.2,p <0.0005);DAS28 并不始终具有预测性(3 个月时的 OR 为 1.0,p=0.987,6 个月时的 OR 为 1.2,p=0.023)。DAS28 是治疗强化的原因占 2.3%,而 SJC 为 51.7%,压痛关节计数为 49.9%,MDGA 为 23.8%。对于相同的 SJC,3 个月时大关节受累比小关节更可能影响治疗(OR 1.4,p=0.027)。
MDGA 与 ERA 患者在 3 个月和 6 个月时治疗增加强烈相关,而 DAS28 则不然。医生很少说明 DAS28 是增加治疗的原因。