Suppr超能文献

与全夜阴茎勃起功能研究相比,卡规用于评估勃起功能障碍患者。

Snap-gauge compared to a full nocturnal penile tumescence study for evaluation of patients with erectile impotence.

作者信息

Allen R, Brendler C B

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

J Urol. 1990 Jan;143(1):51-4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39862-2.

Abstract

A total of 50 consecutive male patients underwent simultaneous Snap-Gauge and full nocturnal penile tumescence evaluation with objective rigidity measurements to determine the correlation between the 2 studies. Subsequent clinical evaluation was conducted in patients in whom the 2 tests differed regarding diagnoses to determine which test more accurately predicted the clinical outcome. One patient was excluded from the study for technical reasons. Of 14 patients who had a normal Snap-Gauge evaluation, defined by breakage of all 3 bands, 12 (86%) had a normal and 2 (14%) had an abnormal nocturnal penile tumescence evaluation. A total of 28 patients failed to break any of the Snap-Gauge bands and 7 broke only 1 or 2 bands. Of these 35 patients with an abnormal Snap-Gauge study 14 (40%) had a normal and 21 (60%) had an abnormal nocturnal penile tumescence evaluation. In a subsequent clinical evaluation 1 of the 2 patients with a normal Snap-Gauge study and an abnormal nocturnal penile tumescence test reported continued inadequate sexual function and, subsequently, he received a penile prosthesis. Of the 14 patients with an abnormal Snap-Gauge study and a normal nocturnal penile tumescence test 11 were located and 8 were sexually active with adequate erections for intercourse without further medical treatment other than counseling. We conclude that the correlation between Snap-Gauge and nocturnal penile tumescence is not good, and that the nocturnal penile tumescence test is more accurate to determine the clinical diagnosis.

摘要

共有50例连续的男性患者同时接受了阴茎折断仪评估和夜间阴茎勃起的全面评估,并进行了客观的硬度测量,以确定这两项研究之间的相关性。对于两项测试诊断结果不同的患者进行了后续临床评估,以确定哪项测试能更准确地预测临床结果。一名患者因技术原因被排除在研究之外。在14例阴茎折断仪评估正常(定义为3条带均断裂)的患者中,12例(86%)夜间阴茎勃起评估正常,2例(14%)异常。共有28例患者未折断阴茎折断仪的任何一条带,7例仅折断1条或2条带。在这35例阴茎折断仪研究异常的患者中,14例(40%)夜间阴茎勃起评估正常,21例(60%)异常。在后续临床评估中,阴茎折断仪评估正常但夜间阴茎勃起测试异常的2例患者中有1例报告性功能仍不足,随后接受了阴茎假体植入。在阴茎折断仪研究异常但夜间阴茎勃起测试正常的14例患者中,找到了11例,其中8例有性活动,勃起功能足以进行性交,除咨询外无需进一步治疗。我们得出结论,阴茎折断仪与夜间阴茎勃起之间的相关性不佳,夜间阴茎勃起测试在确定临床诊断方面更准确。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验