Division of Pulmonary/Critical Care Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Jul;5(4):445-58. doi: 10.1586/ecp.12.28.
Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains a common and serious worldwide health problem. Despite all the advances in therapy, significant interest has focused on the identification of patients with CAP who require intensive care unit admission to improve their outcomes. The severity assessment of CAP provides an important guide to clinicians in deciding the site of care and the use of empiric antibiotics and adjuvant therapy. For years, several clinical assessment scores have been suggested and validated to achieve this goal. The recent introduction of biomarkers as prognostic indicators of severe CAP, whether used alone or in conjunction with other clinical severity of illness scores, has been investigated. An objective scoring system with a high level of sensitivity and specificity to predict the severity of CAP and the need for high levels of care do not exist. Today, the addition of clinical scores and biomarkers to clinical judgment is the best approach to optimize the care of severe CAP. Future research will allow validation of these and newer tools to improve the prognosis of patients with CAP.
社区获得性肺炎(CAP)仍然是一个常见且严重的全球健康问题。尽管在治疗方面取得了许多进展,但人们仍然非常关注识别需要入住重症监护病房以改善预后的 CAP 患者。CAP 的严重程度评估为临床医生提供了一个重要的指导,以决定治疗场所、使用经验性抗生素和辅助治疗。多年来,已经提出并验证了几种临床评估评分来实现这一目标。最近,生物标志物作为严重 CAP 的预后指标的引入,无论是单独使用还是与其他疾病严重程度的临床评分联合使用,都得到了研究。目前,不存在一种客观的评分系统,其具有高灵敏度和特异性来预测 CAP 的严重程度和对高水平护理的需求。如今,将临床评分和生物标志物添加到临床判断中是优化严重 CAP 患者护理的最佳方法。未来的研究将验证这些工具和更新的工具,以改善 CAP 患者的预后。