Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Groennegaardsvej 15, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Water Res. 2012 Nov 15;46(18):5917-34. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.08.011. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
Faecal contamination of soil and tomatoes irrigated by sprinkler as well as surface and subsurface drip irrigation with treated domestic wastewater were compared in 2007 and 2008 at experimental sites in Crete and Italy. Wastewater was treated by Membrane Bio Reactor (MBR) technology, gravel filtration or UV-treatment before used for irrigation. Irrigation water, soil and tomato samples were collected during two cropping seasons and enumerated for the faecal indicator bacterium Escherichia coli and helminth eggs. The study found elevated levels of E. coli in irrigation water (mean: Italy 1753 cell forming unit (cfu) per 100 ml and Crete 488 cfu per 100 ml) and low concentrations of E. coli in soil (mean: Italy 95 cfu g(-1) and Crete 33 cfu g(-1)). Only two out of 84 tomato samples in Crete contained E. coli (mean: 2700 cfu g(-1)) while tomatoes from Italy were free of E. coli. No helminth eggs were found in the irrigation water or on the tomatoes from Crete. Two tomato samples out of 36 from Italy were contaminated by helminth eggs (mean: 0.18 eggs g(-1)) and had been irrigated with treated wastewater and tap water, respectively. Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis DNA fingerprints of E. coli collected during 2008 showed no identical pattern between water and soil isolates which indicates contribution from other environmental sources with E. coli, e.g. wildlife. A quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) model with Monte Carlo simulations adopted by the World Health Organization (WHO) found the use of tap water and treated wastewater to be associated with risks that exceed permissible limits as proposed by the WHO (1.0 × 10(-3) disease risk per person per year) for the accidental ingestion of irrigated soil by farmers (Crete: 0.67 pppy and Italy: 1.0 pppy). The QMRA found that the consumption of tomatoes in Italy was deemed to be safe while permissible limits were exceeded in Crete (1.0 pppy). Overall the quality of tomatoes was safe for human consumption since the disease risk found on Crete was based on only two contaminated tomato samples. It is a fundamental limitation of the WHO QMRA model that it is not based on actual pathogen numbers, but rather on numbers of E. coli converted to estimated pathogen numbers, since it is widely accepted that there is poor correlation between E. coli and viral and parasite pathogens. Our findings also stress the importance of the external environment, typically wildlife, as sources of faecal contamination.
2007 年和 2008 年,在克里特岛和意大利的实验点,对用喷头灌溉的土壤和西红柿、地表滴灌和地下滴灌中受处理家庭废水的粪便污染进行了比较。废水经过膜生物反应器 (MBR) 技术、砾石过滤或紫外线处理,然后用于灌溉。在两个种植季节期间,收集灌溉水、土壤和西红柿样本,并对粪便指示菌大肠杆菌和寄生虫卵进行计数。研究发现,灌溉水中大肠杆菌水平升高(意大利平均值为 1753 个细胞形成单位 (cfu) / 100ml,克里特岛为 488cfu / 100ml),土壤中大肠杆菌浓度较低(意大利平均值为 95cfu/g,克里特岛为 33cfu/g)。在克里特岛的 84 个西红柿样本中,只有 2 个含有大肠杆菌(平均值为 2700cfu/g),而意大利的西红柿则不含大肠杆菌。在克里特岛的灌溉水中或西红柿上未发现寄生虫卵。在意大利的 36 个西红柿样本中,有 2 个受到寄生虫卵污染(平均值为 0.18 个卵/g),分别用处理过的废水和自来水灌溉。2008 年采集的大肠杆菌脉冲场凝胶电泳 DNA 指纹图谱显示,水和土壤分离物之间没有相同的模式,这表明存在其他环境来源的大肠杆菌,例如野生动物。世界卫生组织 (WHO) 采用的定量微生物风险评估 (QMRA) 模型和蒙特卡罗模拟表明,使用自来水和处理过的废水与意外摄入由农民灌溉的土壤有关的风险超过了世卫组织(1.0×10-3 人/年)的可接受限值(意大利:0.67pppy,克里特岛:1.0pppy)。QMRA 发现,意大利消费西红柿是安全的,而在克里特岛,可接受限值被超过(1.0pppy)。总体而言,由于克里特岛仅基于两个受污染的西红柿样本,因此食用西红柿的风险很高,但西红柿的质量仍可安全食用。世界卫生组织 QMRA 模型的一个基本局限性是,它不是基于实际病原体数量,而是基于转化为估计病原体数量的大肠杆菌数量,因为广泛认为大肠杆菌与病毒和寄生虫病原体之间相关性较差。我们的研究结果还强调了外部环境(通常是野生动物)作为粪便污染来源的重要性。