• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提供堕胎服务的医疗机构一线工作人员对州级堕胎法律和政策的了解程度。

Knowledge of state-level abortion laws and policies among front-line staff at facilities providing abortion services.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, B330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215,USA.

出版信息

Womens Health Issues. 2012 Sep;22(5):e415-20. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2012.07.002.

DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2012.07.002
PMID:22944899
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy of information regarding state-level abortion laws and policies received by a simulated patient from front-line staff at facilities providing abortion services.

METHODS

U.S. states were ranked by restrictiveness of access to abortion, and a simulated patient made calls to the five most and six least restrictive states. Three scripts were used to simulate the following three patients: a 17-year-old minor, a married woman, and a woman at 15 weeks of gestation. Each facility was called three times. Accuracy of the information provided was assessed using a list of laws published monthly by the Guttmacher Institute.

RESULTS

Of 138 calls, 72 (52.2%) were made to least restrictive states, and 66 (47.8%) were made to most restrictive states. Information provided by front-line staff was generally excellent, with over 90% accuracy regarding spousal and parental involvement, presence of, and length of mandatory waiting periods. Most inaccuracies were owing to responses of "I don't know." Despite providing highly accurate information regarding the existence of parental involvement laws, only 55.6% of front-line staff members in states with parental involvement laws informed the simulated minor patient of her right to a judicial bypass.

CONCLUSION

Information regarding state abortion laws and policies provided by front-line staff members at facilities that provide abortion services is highly accurate, with the exception of judicial bypass for parental involvement. Resources should be developed for reproductive health care providers and their staff to ensure that all information provided to patients is accurate and comprehensive.

摘要

目的

确定向提供堕胎服务的医疗机构一线工作人员提供的有关州级堕胎法和政策的信息的准确性。

方法

根据堕胎准入的限制程度对美国各州进行排名,然后由一名模拟患者向最宽松的五个州和最严格的六个州的机构打电话。使用三个脚本来模拟以下三种患者:一名 17 岁的未成年人、一名已婚妇女和一名怀孕 15 周的妇女。每个机构被呼叫三次。使用盖特马赫研究所每月公布的法律清单评估提供信息的准确性。

结果

在 138 次通话中,72 次(52.2%)打给了限制最宽松的州,66 次(47.8%)打给了限制最严格的州。一线工作人员提供的信息通常非常准确,对于配偶和父母的参与、强制性等待期的存在和长度,准确率超过 90%。大多数不准确之处是由于回答“我不知道”。尽管提供了有关父母参与法律存在的高度准确信息,但在有父母参与法律的州,只有 55.6%的一线工作人员告知模拟未成年患者她有权进行司法回避。

结论

向提供堕胎服务的医疗机构一线工作人员提供的有关州堕胎法和政策的信息准确性很高,除了父母参与的司法回避。应开发资源,为生殖健康护理提供者及其工作人员提供信息,以确保向患者提供的所有信息都是准确和全面的。

相似文献

1
Knowledge of state-level abortion laws and policies among front-line staff at facilities providing abortion services.提供堕胎服务的医疗机构一线工作人员对州级堕胎法律和政策的了解程度。
Womens Health Issues. 2012 Sep;22(5):e415-20. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2012.07.002.
2
Knowledge of state-level abortion laws and regulations among reproductive health care providers.生殖健康保健提供者对州级堕胎法律和法规的了解。
Womens Health Issues. 2013 Sep-Oct;23(5):e281-6. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
3
Using a simulated patient to assess referral for abortion services in the USA.在美国,使用模拟患者来评估堕胎服务的转诊情况。
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2012 Oct;38(4):246-51. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2011-100176. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
4
The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.州政府对堕胎的限制所产生的经济影响:父母同意和通知法以及医疗补助资金限制。
J Policy Anal Manage. 1993 Summer;12(3):498-511.
5
Factors hindering access to abortion services.阻碍获得堕胎服务的因素。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1995 Mar-Apr;27(2):54-9, 87.
6
Abortion patients' perceptions of abortion regulation.堕胎患者对堕胎法规的看法。
Womens Health Issues. 2010 Jan-Feb;20(1):12-9. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2009.08.005.
7
A mystery caller evaluation of Medicaid staff responses about state coverage of abortion care.神秘来电者评估医疗补助计划工作人员对堕胎护理的州级覆盖范围的回应。
Womens Health Issues. 2012 Mar;22(2):e143-8. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2011.11.001. Epub 2011 Dec 11.
8
How are restrictive abortion statutes associated with unintended teen birth?限制堕胎法规与意外青少年妊娠有何关联?
J Adolesc Health. 2010 Aug;47(2):160-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.01.003. Epub 2010 Mar 20.
9
Fertility-related state laws enacted in 1981.1981年颁布的与生育相关的州法律。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1982 Mar-Apr;14(2):63-7.
10
Legislation on contraception and abortion for adolescents.关于青少年避孕与堕胎的立法。
Stud Fam Plann. 1985 Sep-Oct;16(5):241-51.

引用本文的文献

1
Judicial bypass for minors post-.未成年人案件的司法豁免后置。
Womens Health (Lond). 2023 Jan-Dec;19:17455057231219601. doi: 10.1177/17455057231219601.
2
Abortion care pathways and service provision for adolescents in high-income countries: A qualitative synthesis of the evidence.高收入国家青少年的堕胎护理途径与服务提供:证据的定性综合分析
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 9;15(11):e0242015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242015. eCollection 2020.
3
Women's knowledge of their state's abortion regulations. A national survey.妇女对其所在州堕胎法规的了解。一项全国性调查。
Contraception. 2020 Nov;102(5):318-326. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
4
Massachusetts' Parental Consent Law and Procedural Timing Among Adolescents Undergoing Abortion.马萨诸塞州父母同意法与行人工流产术青少年的程序时间安排。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 May;133(5):978-986. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003190.