Thoracic Oncology Program, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA.
Oncogene. 2013 Aug 22;32(34):4028-33. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.404. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
Ras oncogenes (Hras, Kras and Nras) are important drivers of carcinogenesis. However, tumors with Ras mutations often show loss of the corresponding wild-type (WT) allele, suggesting that proto-oncogenic forms of Ras can function as a suppressor of carcinogenesis. In vitro studies also suggest that WT Ras proteins can suppress the tumorigenic properties of alternate mutant Ras family members, but in vivo evidence for these heterologous interactions is lacking. We have investigated the genetic interactions between different combinations of mutant and WT Ras alleles in vivo using carcinogen-induced lung and skin carcinogenesis in mice with targeted deletion of different Ras family members. The major suppressor effect of WT Kras is observed only in mutant Kras-driven lung carcinogenesis, where loss of one Kras allele led to increased tumor number and size. Deletion of one Hras allele dramatically reduced the number of skin papillomas with Hras mutations, consistent with Hras as the major target of mutation in these tumors. However, skin carcinoma numbers were very similar, suggesting that WT Hras functions as a suppressor of progression from papillomas to invasive squamous carcinomas. In the skin, the Kras proto-oncogene functions cooperatively with mutant Hras to promote papilloma development, although the effect is relatively small. In contrast, the Hras proto-oncogene attenuated the activity of mutant Kras in lung carcinogenesis. Interestingly, loss of Nras increased the number of mutant Kras-induced lung tumors, but decreased the number of mutant Hras-induced skin papillomas. These results show that the strongest suppressor effects of WT Ras are only seen in the context of mutation of the cognate Ras protein, and only relatively weak effects are detected on tumor development induced by mutations in alternative family members. The data also underscore the complex and context-dependent nature of interactions between proto-oncogenic and oncogenic forms of different Ras family members during tumor development.
Ras 癌基因(Hras、Kras 和 Nras)是致癌作用的重要驱动因素。然而,带有 Ras 突变的肿瘤通常会失去相应的野生型(WT)等位基因,这表明原癌形式的 Ras 可以作为致癌作用的抑制剂。体外研究还表明,WT Ras 蛋白可以抑制替代突变 Ras 家族成员的致瘤特性,但缺乏这些异源相互作用的体内证据。我们使用针对不同 Ras 家族成员进行靶向缺失的小鼠,研究了致癌剂诱导的肺和皮肤癌发生过程中不同突变和 WT Ras 等位基因组合的体内遗传相互作用。WT Kras 的主要抑制作用仅在突变 Kras 驱动的肺癌发生中观察到,其中一个 Kras 等位基因的缺失导致肿瘤数量和大小增加。缺失一个 Hras 等位基因可显著减少带有 Hras 突变的皮肤乳头状瘤数量,这与 Hras 是这些肿瘤中主要突变靶标一致。然而,皮肤癌数量非常相似,表明 WT Hras 作为从乳头状瘤到侵袭性鳞状细胞癌进展的抑制剂发挥作用。在皮肤中,Kras 原癌基因与突变 Hras 协同作用促进乳头状瘤的发展,尽管作用相对较小。相比之下,Hras 原癌基因在肺致癌作用中减弱了突变 Kras 的活性。有趣的是,Nras 的缺失增加了突变 Kras 诱导的肺肿瘤数量,但减少了突变 Hras 诱导的皮肤乳头状瘤数量。这些结果表明,WT Ras 的最强抑制作用仅在相应 Ras 蛋白突变的情况下才会出现,而在替代家族成员突变诱导的肿瘤发展中仅检测到相对较弱的作用。该数据还强调了不同 Ras 家族成员的原癌和致癌形式在肿瘤发展过程中的复杂和依赖于背景的相互作用。